NY police receive "unverified radiological threat", page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 10-8-2007 @ 10:45 PM by Implosion

NY police receive "unverified radiological threat"


www.reuters.com
NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York city police increased security throughout Manhattan on Friday and at bridges and tunnels in response to what they called an "unverified radiological threat," but said the city's alert status remained unchanged.

The New York Police Department said in a statement it has increased the deployment of radiological sensors on vehicles, boats and helicopters and had set up vehicle checkpoints in lower Manhattan and at bridges and tunnels.

(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 10-8-2007 @ 10:56 PM by Johnmike
www.ny1.com...

What concerns me more is the lack of information.



reply posted on 10-8-2007 @ 11:43 PM by Implosion
Reuters have updated the story since I posted it.

And Bloomberg also sought to soothe New Yorkers.

"Earlier this evening, the NYPD began taking several public precautionary measures visible to New Yorkers to guard against an unverified threat that was found on the Internet," he said.


I believe this threat may be the one picked up by
DEBKAfile:

DEBKAfile Exclusive: New Al Qaeda threat of radioactive truck attacks naming New York, Los Angeles, Miami

The threat was picked up by DEBKAfile’s monitors from a rush of electronic chatter on al Qaeda sites Thursday, Aug. 8.

The al Qaeda communications accuse the Americans of the grave error of failing to take seriously the videotape released by the American al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gaddahn last week. “They will soon realize their mistake when American cities are hit by quality operations,” said one message.

Another said the attacks would be carried out “by means of trucks loaded with radio-active material against America’s biggest city and financial nerve center.”

Source.


Which is also to be found here on ATS:

New Al Qaeda threat of radioactive truck attacks naming New York, Los Angeles, Miami

[edit on 10/8/07 by Implosion]


reply posted on 11-8-2007 @ 11:06 AM by Implosion
This may shed some light on the reasons why the NYC authorities are taking the story so seriously:

Although the attacks of September 11, 2001 stunned the world, they came as no surprise to Giora Shamis and Diane Shalem—two veteran foreign-affairs reporters for the Economist who, like a handful of other journalists at the turn of the millennium, had turned to the Internet to go into business for themselves. In February of 2001, their freshly-launched website devoted to terrorism reported that Osama bin Laden intended to attack the World Trade Center towers in New York. "We'd been following his activities since his days as an organizer of the mujahideen in Afghanistan in the '80s," recalls Shalem. "We knew what he was capable of."


[emphasis mine]

So, they apparently predicted the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centre.

I wonder why if New York, Los Angeles and Miami are mentioned in the DEBKAfile story, only New York is reported as being on alert. Perhaps the NYC authorities have additional information, or maybe all three cities are on alert, and only NYC has made it into the MSM.

Interestingly enough, I've seen speculation that DEBKAfile is actually a Mossad run propaganda machine. Of course, that shouldn't be surprising. I think every Internet based media outlet seems to have someone of an opposing view making similar claims in an attempt to demonise them. Hell, it even happens with ATS, which according to some is obviously COINTELPRO.

[edit on 11/8/07 by Implosion]


reply posted on 12-8-2007 @ 12:41 AM by FreeThinkerIdealist
It is possible, and if they didn't send the detectors out, we would chastise them later if something happened.

The local authorities, I would say, mostly don't have a clue, even if it is a false fear and control op.

I would say the suv in that video resembles D.C. area more than NYC ... maybe LA, though I never been to LA.

I don't see why Miami would be a target, I think its population, though large, is over-rated.

I could see D.C. being more of a target, especially if the 'right' people are out on 'vacation' or business at the same time. If such an attack on D.C. happened, and it was no longer inhabitable ... guess what, the presidential directive would be readily accepted by the public, even by those who may not agree with it.

This may be a bit outdated (1990 census), but sticking to trends, I am sure it is still a rather good representation of the population distribution in the major cities, hence my reasoning:


A cut and paste didn't work for a quote (lost its structure), but here is the link, it is the second set of population statistics is where the following information was pulled from:
census.gov

Sorry it isn't pretty, but I wanted to make a quick and easy reference for those who didn't want to click on the link.


NY, NY ... city rank 1 population 7,323,000 ... urbanized area rank 1 population 16,044,000

LA, CA ... #2 - 3,485,000 ... #2 - 11,403,000

D.C. ... #19 - 607,000 ... #7 - 3,363,000

Miami ... #46 - 359,000 ... #16 - 1,915,000



It would be a practical assumption that some growth has happened, and nearly 10% of america's population lies within the top 2 cities. D.C. is a tactical weapon. Whether a false flag to destroy the public security and control them, or done by an outside organization, with or without prior knowledge from out government. A 3 point strike on those targets would be a huge hit on our infrastructure and moral. Of course, a larger strike (such as the 6+ city prediction) would include quite a few more on that list, which could contaminate, wound, or kill up to or exceeding 20-30% of the population in one day's worth of strikes. The numbers are there.

Depending on what you see or believe as to who would execute, their competence and ability ... we could be in for quite a shock. Do I believe it will happen, I don't know. Like everyone else has said, there has been a lot of chatter, warnings, messages ... conditioning or desensitization seems to be happening in some form. I am not claiming it is the intent, that is up for the individual to decide. I do see a reason to keep our eyes and minds open to any possibility from any enemy.


reply posted on 12-8-2007 @ 05:58 AM by Muppetus Galacticus


reply posted on 12-8-2007 @ 08:41 AM by FreeThinkerIdealist
Good point

I fully consider it as a secondary target. I still think the three I said would be the top priority for either false flag or terrorist for the reasons I stated.

With the reports of up to 22 cities ... we are talking half the citizens in u.s.america if they focus on population centers ... which also take out infrastructure and the rest suffer. Maybe a large dirty bomb in the food crops section ... but we don't produce too much any more, right?

Reading one of the newer 9/11 conspiracies ... this radiological threat is even scarier. Laser/energy based weapon. They have them. They could set it to X or gamma ray bursts and a strong and prolonged exposure would be bad. Since the ones controlling that expensive equipment would be high up, relying on the soldier to say no may not even be possible. Ground based ones yes, but orbital ones, no.

I don't know what to believe anymore. I don't sit and fret, I live my life. I will just not watch the news with as innocent an eye as last time. I don't have cable, so I don't know how I would watch the news anyway! But seriously, much more skeptical.

I am happy a site such as this exists ... real news, and possibly fast unadulterated photos and video. I am sure there are more people than in 01 ... and 6 years of arguing points on 9/11 have developed eagle eyes for picking out picture and video anomalies, and deciphering new truths through the mess.

Man, I can't believe I forgot about the cruise business

My heart goes out to all of you NY'ers ... I love your city, but I wouldn't want to deal with the constant 'threats' you hear ... then add the recent tornadoes, pipes bursting, subways flooding ... it is quite a struggle up there.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags