posted on Aug, 10 2007 @ 12:02 PM
I have been a reader of the boards now for a few months and this is my first post. First about me. I was working that day in lower Manhattan as a
Proprietary trader, I traded for myself with the aid of backing from a firm. I was not at my desk yet, as it was a beautiful day outside. I did not
work in the buildings, but was "near by".
As the first plane went by the noise made me look up and just as it was about to hit the building I first saw it. Everything from what I saw leads me
to believe it was a plane. Not for one second did I think this was an accident, so when we heard the second plane and I looked up, I can say that
from everything I saw it was nothing BUT a plane. But that is not what I want this thread to be about. I am not about debunking any theories or
causing any big time stirs. I lost a few friends in that building and do not need bring any ghosts back to my mind. What I do want to do is put out
a theory and then ask all of you a question.
Feel free to comment on my theory, BUT please comment on my question at the very end of the post. I had spent many days in the buildings either
visiting friends, analysts or business aquaintances. I had long noticed constant work on both buildings which all began after the first attack that
failed. My theory is as follows: They determined that due to the failed attack, they would be a constant target going forward. Everyone can agree
on that. What could they due to ensure the safety of the city? I feel that it was deteremined that the buildings would be loaded with charges, that
if attacked and the attack was serious enough, the building could be brought down safely.
I believe the charges had been in place since almost immediatley after the first attack with the hopes of never having to use them. All the work that
was going from that point on were strengthen the building and further increase the ability of a safe implosion. Like I said earlier in my post, I am
rather new and hope I am not breaking any rules during this post. I do not know if this has been spoken about in the past, so please don't shoot me
if it has. BUT here is my question. If, in fact this theory is possible, and the buildings were really brought down by insiders, for the purpose of
not causing serious harm to downtown NY, is this still wrong?
I understand that many lives were lost, I personally witnessed many people die that day, either from falling out windows or jumping out on their own.
It took place some time after the evacuations were ordered and they possbily could have felt that the fall of the buildings were to take place very
soon. Would they really be at fault if they "pulled" the buildings to prevent further loss of life of the thousands of resue workers located around
What if the conspiracy is nothing more than bringing the buildings down a bit earlier than they would have come down on their own? What if they saved
10,000 lives by controlling the demolition instead of allowing them to fall? Sorry for the long post, but have been wanting to get your opinions on
this matter for a while now. I will sit back and listen to your responses, I am not trying to create further debate on any debunking theories.
[edit for paragraphing]
[edit on 10-8-2007 by ADVISOR]