It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HaveSeen4Myself
Just before the South Tower collapsed a bomb went off at street level. There was a reporter closeby and their mic picked up a massive boom. The new anchor lady actually flinched and ducked her head when this happened.
The FOX anchors IIRC were Shepherd Smith and Brit Hume but not completely sure because they didn't botch it up to the degree of CNN. There were no female anchors at FOX on the morning of 9/11 and they damn sure weren't sitting at a round coffee table. They were at the news desk.
Originally posted by Ed Littlefox
Originally posted by Pavil
Hmmm. CNN transcipts of the pre 9:00 hour show something different than your recollection:
transcripts.cnn.com...
Aaron Brown joins sometime after 9:30.
Your contention is that they have totally replaced the intial broadcast with the ones we current see and have records of?
Sorry I am not convinced.
Man when will you see the evidence: there is nothing to support such theory as far as broadcasted footages through the tv networks are concerned.
I'm starting to think you're a a disinfo agent of some sort.
I believe the footages represent what happened even if edited & i believe we don't focus on the things we should have explored first.
"If" there was any conspiracy then we should investigate on dick cheney and his gang...plain & simple.
Conspiracies have masterminds,find the root of the matter equals finding the truth.
Everything else Is pure B.S in my opinion
[edit on 11-8-2007 by themaster1]
Originally posted by infinityoreilly
Originally posted by Project_Silo
haha there is nothing to debunk.Hes not claiming anything other than they hid footage of them making a mistake about what kinda plane it was in the heat of the moment.....
It was a chevy o wait a ford.Ohh booooy who cares?
I think it's possible that some of the original broadcasts that morning have been removed from the archive, can I proove this? No. Is it important? I'm not sure. 911 is more mystery than proovable fact as show here on ATS. The media is at the center of the storm because we all rely on it for the information that helps us form are opinion of the world and the events that shape our veiw of not only ourselves but others.
Do you trust the media to give you the staight story?
Thats the bottom line idea the OP is getting at.
quote by themaster1 Man when will you see the evidence: there is nothing to support such theory as far as broadcasted footages through the tv networks are concerned.
I'm starting to think you're a a disinfo agent of some sort.
Originally posted by Valhall
Trust the man who seeks the truth...doubt the man who claims to have found it.
[edit on 8-12-2007 by Valhall]
I'm not okay with the statement the OP just made in his last diatribe. Not sure what burr is under your saddle, but intimating that the vast majority of traffic on discussion boards are shills is offensive and inflammatory...and I'd like to add typical behavior for some one who has a theory/opinion they have decided is the only truth and any one who doesn't agree is the enemy. That ol' blatant fear of open-mindedness.
No - your first post is a theory that you've yet to give evidence to support.
Originally posted by Ed Littlefox
The Truth of 9/11 has not yet been revealed, and it will never be found until such time as we put "beliefs and personal opinions" aside and start looking for the Truth and the Truth alone--while we still have the Freedom to do it.
No, Ed, I'm not rejecting you or the OP's account. What I'm saying is that the statement that all the pre-impact footage has been destroyed is wrong. I'm not for a minute stating you guys are wrong in your recollection or have flawed memories, or are lying. And I have no problem accepting that what you say was reported was, in fact, reported. What I'm saying is, there are archives of pre-impact news coverage.