Fox News/CNN Sold Us Out & Destroyed The Evidence, page 4

Originally posted by Pavil

Hmmm. CNN transcipts of the pre 9:00 hour show something different than your recollection:

transcripts.cnn.com...

Aaron Brown joins sometime after 9:30.

Your contention is that they have totally replaced the intial broadcast with the ones we current see and have records of?

Sorry I am not convinced.

There is only one thing I wish to bring to this discussion, and that regards that there is at least "reasonable doubt" that the Official Story is true; whether completely or in part.

Media Transcripts, for both organizational and legal reasons, cannot be automatically considered as accurate, even when such is stated. The same is true of media footage as transmitted. ALL of it has been edited, and some of that editing is done with assistance from outside the Media itself.

The only time this factor doesn't play a role in Broadcasting is when the camera and commentary are "hot". There is a "edit window" on a hot link of between 5 and 16 seconds, depending on whether the link is local/direct of via up-link to a bird. Sometimes, and particularly in the case of an event like 9/11, when ALL of the media are focused on a single point, 5 - 16 seconds is NOT enough time. This fact was both repeated and reiterated in the Katrina Disaster, by a NO TV station, who, despite the collapse of their own transmitting tower, remained on the "air" via live-streaming video on the Internet, for more than 10 days WITHOUT the knowledge of FEMA, The military, or any other federal agency. This is how we ALL found out what a complete FUBAR that "recovery operation" was.

What I am saying is, don't trust "History", or "Washington Truth", (the story told at the end of the day). Understand what you are seeing, what you are reading, and consider the sources and the lapses in time between the event and the publication. Above all else, Listen to, and consider, the eye-witness reports viewed in real time-- the footage you see or witnessed by honest others in real-time, shot live, and broadcast live.

I am going to stick my neck out a little further, and for the good it has the possibility of bringing to this entire 9/11 discussion; et al. I am a professionally trained observer, and spent a LOT of years being paid to do that by________. By virtue of this, I can also spot a DIA in less time than it takes to say the initials. I'll tell you a secret--a real one. If you listen to any person or group long enough, a pattern emerges--and within that pattern is a complete dossier on an individual or group, inclusive of it's true intent. In other words, talk to me or someone who has had the same training and jobs, and you will inadvertently and quite unconsciously tell me your entire life story, including what you do NOT want known. In Investigations like 9/11, I use the same techniques.

Just remember this--wherever and whenever Truth is being purposefully withheld and lies are being told, there will always be contradictions and 'slip-up" statements. The science of it is to catch these--repeatedly--and that is what I, personally, have found to ne the case regarding 9/11. This whole discussion isn't about "supporting a point of view", it is about getting at the Truth regardless of what that is or which way it turns out. We deserve no less as a people than a valid an truthful explanation of this Event and any other of national magnitude. We should strive for, and accept, no less.

I'm done.

[edit on 11-8-2007 by Ed Littlefox]