It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by future flow
edit;
they finnaly aired thier whole story and said it was a french guy who did it at home on his macbook pro using the vue 6 program.
wheather you belive them or not is on you but thats what they said.
and that was after spending two hours of hype leading people to belive it could have been real....when they already knew it was fake...prolly from checkin here lol but still what do you guys make of this?
[edit on 22-8-2007 by future flow]
Originally posted by BlackedOut
@ seentoomuch
Uhhh, duh?
Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.
Mod Note: General ATS Discussion Etiquette – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 22-8-2007 by 12m8keall2c]
beverins you clip is good the spacecraft model needs work but I don't think the original was made in Vue 6 just the background.
Originally posted by ummofriend
hi,
I'm here for a couple of hours now and then again later this evening(european time).
the code is "YES"
Originally posted by paulnzl
FOX News just showed this clip. The anchors seem to think it is somewhat genuine.
Originally posted by Torlough
If it's fox you know they are going to sensationalize it to the max.
Originally posted by ummofriend
Hi all,
I've just read all 71 pages of this debate. One thing keeps nagging at me.
Don't you find it a bit suspicious
a) that so much talent was deployed to make one of the best fake ufo sightings ever for no apparent economic (I don't buy the viral marketing theory) reason?
b) that all this effort was made only to be immediately undeniably debunked because a crude and flagrant "mistake" no self-respecting CGI guy would ever allow himself to make?
It seems obvious whoever did this wanted us to find them out.
It's like a game and we're behaving like tamed little boys and girls finding the clues exactly when expected to.
The effect of this clip is manyfold.
First effect will be to instill doubt in the face of further video-recorded sightings, no matter how real they may seem, which is in my opinion a good thing.
Second, by putting forward mainstream CGI software that allow for the creation of hyper realistic footage, authentic footage will now be drowned in the soon-to-come flood of amateur fake clips.
To me this smacks of preemptive debunking for potential genuine encounters, which are probably near if we're witnessing so much effort to discredit it.
What we should be trying to figure out is why it's been so easy?
Why would someone deploy such perfection and then commit such an amateurish blunder? It doesn't make sense except if you envisage that this was done on purpose and this is all unfolding as planned.
Remember, the boy who cried wolf did get eaten in the end and amongst all these hoaxes will we recognize the real ones?
Originally posted by BlackedOut
Thoughts?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
If he is the video creator, it certainly looks like his first involvement here was to perpetuate the hoax a bit longer... which seems to conflict with the information published by the LA Times.
Originally posted by BlackedOut
The FIRST video posted to YouTube, containing these video elements, was posted by user "ladave1969," several days before the barzolff video appeared.
Now, we have a story in the LA Times, written by a man named Dave (David), which mentions only the username "barzolff814." I find it suspicious, though I have really nothing more to add.