[HOAX] Haiti UFO Video - YouTube - [HOAX], page 71
Pages: <<  68    69    70    71    72    73    74  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 61 times


reply posted on 15-8-2007 @ 10:09 AM by 11 11
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Someone has added some sound effects to the video, and created a search arbitrage site.
www.haitiufosite.com...


This is starting to remind me of www.isaaccaret.com now... what makes me really sick is going to that web page to see google adsense ads. Everyone is trying to cash in on this crap and its pathetic. It's only going to get worse too, because people are going to see how fast these stupid hoax's spread and try to mimic it....

..so i think this is only the beginning. The more flaws we point out in these hoaxs, the better the next one will be. If the populous wasn't so easly controlled by these hoax's this wouldn't be a problem. But the way it looks, the sheep out number the dogs.



reply posted on 15-8-2007 @ 10:20 AM by beverins
Originally posted by leviterande


However, being a CG editor/director artist myself I will tell you that none of the hollywood movies not even transformers is good as this, not only the amazing graphics but to synchronize the motion of the real camera with the motion of the cg camera, that is even by the most expensive BOUJOU tracking software very very diffecult, and the even more crazy thing I will tell you is that they zoomed in too, do you peoble know how diffecult it is to do that, if not impossible, to zoom in and mix 3d object with it while it is shaken, i wish they used this technology in movies


I hate to tell ya but they do use these in movies all the time. And it really isn't that hard to do in Boujou either. What boujou and matchmover do is to analyze pixels in the imagery you give it. The degree of accuracy is determined by how accurately you place the points. Boujou in particular does an excellent job automatically and then allows you to fine tune the pixel tracking. These sort of trackers, though, do fail. Some shots are just too hard to track automatically, and the time investment for people getting paid and on a deadline is not worth it. However, to make a 30 second clip, a person can easily spend 3-4 hours a day or more (some computer people are VERY VERY dedicated and just sit there in front of their screen for hours every day - I'm one of them! ) tweaking a 30 second clip until it looks perfect.

I think you would be completely surprised by how much 3D is used in movies since 1990, and how much if it you never notice, and completely trust that it is reality you are looking at. Indeed, one of the mantras of people who do 3D animation work like this is "if the people think its real, and do not notice what we did, then it is a job well done"

Doing CG myself, I don't say its easy. The guy who did the Haiti video is a very dedicated artist. And to be honest - think about it. By releasing such a nice hoax, he's gotten over 1 million views and that's just on Youtube. Is also been crosslinked to Google Video, Liveleak and a bunch of others. You said its even in your newspaper! It was on Attack of the Show. If he had posted it as a demo reel in Film and Animation category on Youtube, it would have like 400 views and nobody would be talking about it. I think the artist is pretty damn chuffed about his work now, a huge ego boost that he's managed to fool even 1/4 of the people who've watched this video.

And yeah, you're right. He can get a job with this. He wouldn't be able to, though, if it hadn't been posted as "real". Think about that too.


reply posted on 15-8-2007 @ 10:30 AM by beverins
Originally posted by jimbo999
Originally posted by evolve


I made this with a few clicks in Vue 6 for a quick and dirty render. The more time you spend creating something like this, the more realistic it will look.



Not too bad - but I'm still inclined to go with the hand-held cam therory myself still.

J.


Well, the organic motion of the CG cam looks handheld.

With some planning, its really not that hard to do (yes, you do need the software and how to use it).

What you do is film something. Transfer that video as frames into your matchmoving application. Have it calculate the motion, and tell the matchmoving software that the camera is what is moving and the scene is what is still. Tweak if needed.

What you end up with is a "baked" camera. Baking is the process by which each frame is given a precise coordinate. Essentially, the software gives the CG camera a keyframe on every single frame.

Once that's done, you are free to animate whatever you want to do. You don't even need the video anymore. All you need to do is animate while looking through your "baked" camera. Transferring the camera motion data to different programs is very easy, and you can import camera data to Vue.

Imagineer Systems Demoreels These are links to a software used for image replacement. No arcane magic is needed to learn these programs, and the company would probably be happy to give out a 30 day demo. At any rate, watch these videos and see how flawless some of these tracking and rendering composites are.


reply posted on 15-8-2007 @ 11:25 AM by ummofriend
Hi all,

I've just read all 71 pages of this debate. One thing keeps nagging at me.
Don't you find it a bit suspicious
a) that so much talent was deployed to make one of the best fake ufo sightings ever for no apparent economic (I don't buy the viral marketing theory) reason?
b) that all this effort was made only to be immediately undeniably debunked because a crude and flagrant "mistake" no self-respecting CGI guy would ever allow himself to make?
It seems obvious whoever did this wanted us to find them out.
It's like a game and we're behaving like tamed little boys and girls finding the clues exactly when expected to.
The effect of this clip is manyfold.
First effect will be to instill doubt in the face of further video-recorded sightings, no matter how real they may seem, which is in my opinion a good thing.
Second, by putting forward mainstream CGI software that allow for the creation of hyper realistic footage, authentic footage will now be drowned in the soon-to-come flood of amateur fake clips.
To me this smacks of preemptive debunking for potential genuine encounters, which are probably near if we're witnessing so much effort to discredit it.
What we should be trying to figure out is why it's been so easy?
Why would someone deploy such perfection and then commit such an amateurish blunder? It doesn't make sense except if you envisage that this was done on purpose and this is all unfolding as planned.
Remember, the boy who cried wolf did get eaten in the end and amongst all these hoaxes will we recognize the real ones?


reply posted on 15-8-2007 @ 12:21 PM by beverins
Originally posted by ghostryder21
Nuff sed I was wrong about it. I wasted a lot of time researching all the aspects of the video and such only to be PROVEN false. So I apologize for all the actions I have undertaken about this.

Sigh….this really makes me not want to research anything again.


I would say don't be depressed about it. Just look at things with an open mind, both ways. Open mind doesn't mean "believer". Open Mind means that you are willing to believe but you have to look at in what way it could be faked. Very useful skills; don't think that it was a waste of time, think of it as "XP" videogame experience points.

I suppose I'll just come out and say I am a believer myself. I accept as fact that there are other intelligent lifeforms out there in the universe, and I also accept that chances are they have (and continue to) visit us. I cannot dismiss the personal experiences of abductees, and there is just too much in this universe that is unknown to us. I mean, comon, we are still discovering new species of life on THIS planet!

Having said that, I have never personally either seen or photographed a UFO. I also believe in ghosts and spirits. Haven't seen a one of those either. Even after I spook myself out by watching all 3 seasons of "Ghost Hunters" in one week (vacation), I STILL do not see ANYthing even remotely ghostlike. I look in the sky, and everytime I see something curious... well, I go "wow! UFO?" and then after about 1/2 a second I've got the object sussed out. I've never been blessed with some of the tales (or authentic looking images) of some strange airship hovering over my car or house or something.

When I first clicked on the Haiti Ufo video, I was hoping this was a real thing. The minute the ship appeared I knew it was a CG ship. I marveled, however, after repeated views at the nice rendering, lighting, and focus.
Pages: <<  68    69    70    71    72    73    74  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO in Riga, Latvia?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
Empty Plane Theory
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama\'s College Classmate Speaks Out!!!!
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Machu Picchu: Hidden face?
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Possible alien at Russian Machine plant ?
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
Massive US Troop Movements In California Raise Russian Concerns
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Ghost in kitchen - [HOAX]
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags
KISSFM Records Strange Noise
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags