[HOAX] Haiti UFO Video - YouTube - [HOAX], page 63
Pages: <<  60    61    62    63    64    65    66  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 61 times


reply posted on 13-8-2007 @ 08:45 PM by danx
Originally posted by WAZZIT32
Just because someone comes forward and says...look...I did this!!! Does that mean it's true? I mean by this...ok.....let's see....

[...]

It could be nothing but, I cannot be the only person to notice this!!!!


Did you read
my post and everyone else's saying that we will be waiting for the proof that ItHasToEnd said he would be sending to Springer?

No one is jumping to conclusions here. ItHasToEnd did post a screenshot of an apparent message sent from the uploader of the Haiti video on Youtube to him. Can this screenshot be faked? Sure.

Again, no one is accepting what we're being told blindly. That's why Springer and other members members have requested for proof to be sent to ATS. Which, according to ItHasToEnd will occur no later than Friday.



reply posted on 13-8-2007 @ 09:11 PM by 11 11
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
11:11

I believe what you are saying last post and you know more than I do. But you are the CGI expert and I just called you out here... I've done it before here too with other experts.



....mm k

Lets get this 100% clear now.



Do you not see atmospheric haze/fog on the Demo image? Or the fact the Sun is more dim?

These are settings that can be changed to your liking, with this software. This has a major effect on the look of the tree, and the solidness of the branches, so I guarantee you this is your main concern's answer.

These light settings have a major effect on the Bump Map of the object.
en.wikipedia.org...

Also, like I said earlyer, It is entirly possible for the computers that are running this demo to display the enviorment differently. One computer may be running on DirectX 9, and another may be running on DirectX 10. Both have MAJOR differences in lighting and shading.

But what is the real issue here? Both of the trees in the image above are a 100% match in size and shape. That is not the only palm tree to match either. So, multiple matching trees? I don't see what you are trying to get at.... The Dominican UFO is made with Vue 6, there for its a hoax.


reply posted on 13-8-2007 @ 09:48 PM by Leigh Scott
I've been fascinated by this video since I first saw it over the weekend. I have to say that I am unimpressed by the person claiming to be part of the hoax. I'm not sure why he is being taken so seriously without real evidence. The real evidence that would sell me is the original "background" plate that the CGI elements were put into (in other words, the famous shots or shots without any UFOs).

Now, I'm not saying that these videos are real or proof positive of anything. But I will say that they have not been debunked to the point that people think they have. Here's a few reasons why I say that.

1. For a living I produce and direct movies for the sci-fi channel and the DTV markets. Almost all of the films I do involve some CGI and over time I've become familiar with the programs myself and the artists who use them. CGI guys are very particular and very knowledgeable. Each piece of software has a specific purpose. The guy (or girl) claiming to be part of this didn't say what I would expect. I would expect him to say something more like this "The ships were modeled and rendered in Lightwave, then comped into a live action plate with shake. We used Vue to add in a few more trees rather than rotoscope around real trees. We tracked the source footage in Boujou to then comp in the trees and UFOs." See what I mean?

2. Living in Hollywood I see palm trees everyday. Looking out my window right now, Sunset Blvd. is lined with them. I could easily take a still photo then compare them to the Vue demo or even cut and paste them to make them look cloned. They look that similar in real life, let alone low res screen grabs from a low res youtube video.

3. Lastly, if I were to direct this shot there would be no need for CGI trees or fake sun etc. Unless it's a test for a specific piece of software, I think the shot could be done by simply adding in the 3D models to an existing handheld shot. The camera movement and focus whiffs are too dirty and realistic to be generated 100% in a CGI environment. CGI camera moves have a certain look to them, even when they are trying to mimic handheld shots. Watch the fake handheld stuff in the Vue demo, or watch any episode of BATTLESTAR GALACTICA.

If anything, I think the portion of the video where the ship flies over the palm tree is the one element that may give it away. It's a great place for a "cut point" to merge two separate shots together.

Wow, though, fascinating stuff to watch a conspiracy unfold right before our eyes. This should all be in a movie....

Leigh Scott
www.imdb.com...
Pages: <<  60    61    62    63    64    65    66  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO in Riga, Latvia?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
Empty Plane Theory
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama\'s College Classmate Speaks Out!!!!
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Machu Picchu: Hidden face?
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Possible alien at Russian Machine plant ?
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
Massive US Troop Movements In California Raise Russian Concerns
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Ghost in kitchen - [HOAX]
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags
KISSFM Records Strange Noise
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags