[HOAX] Haiti UFO Video - YouTube - [HOAX], page 41
Pages: <<  38    39    40    41    42    43    44  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 61 times


reply posted on 11-8-2007 @ 11:16 PM by danx
I noticed something on the second video (the so called 'Dominican Republic' video). At around 5 or 6 seconds into the video a craft passes in front of the sun.

I created two sets of images with the respective frame numbers:

set 1 (frames 172, 173 & 174)

set 2 (frames 183, 185 & 187)

Even though the sun is of a considerable size, how come the craft seems to block the light from the sun on frame 174 and yet fails to do so on the frames of set 2?

Shouldn't the frames of set 1 show the similar effect of the sun as it's shown in set 2?


reply posted on 11-8-2007 @ 11:17 PM by Mr Jackdaw
I was under the impression that viral marketing usually referenced a product - or a subject/object that would be familiar to a product's fans - the target audience of the campaign. Two examples that come to mind are Halo's ARG called Iris (search up Halo 3 Iris in Google and you will get relevant results), and the recent campaign for the Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie.

In the former, the Society of the Ancients (see their evidence page) reference items that are popular in the Ancient Astronaut crowd; the Antikythera device and Stonehenge, to name two. But at the bottom of the page, their "update: Eastern Africa?" section displays the glyph which is now clearly associated with Halo 3. All subsequent updates to the Halo ARG have involved that glyph, or any number of other objects that are known in the Halo Universe. After the initial surprise, a clear match of the glyph was soon identified in a new image of Master Chief, the main character in the Halo series.

The second viral marketing campaign (Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie) turned out like this:

small electronic devices were misidentified by Boston police as "improvised explosive devices", leading to a false bomb scare that culminated in two arrests. The devices turned out to be LED displays of the Mooninites (image here and here. For more details on it, you're welcome to read the Wikipedia article on it.

Meanwhile, we have these videos - and for a stretch, the CARET issue which seems to keep resurfacing. I am not advocating any of the presented evidence as fact; I will however state that since a clear match has not been made to any products - and since the discussed videos (Dominican Republic and Haiti) only feature the same craft, and no clear link to anything else, it would be ridiculous to settle on the thought that they are a viral marketing campaign. Both videos have been presented as UFO evidence - and no one is trying to sell the planet UFOs, so that rules out the "viral marketing" thing for now. Sure, the videos have received a lot of attention. The 9/11 incident did, too. Anyone want to call that a viral marketing campaign?

I say we move ahead with this discussion. The viral marketing angle is -- was -- a viable one. But until a product or additional factor has been identified, I suggest we drop it and proceed with others. We must analyze the video for other clues - and watch the web, and ATS forums to see if anything else pops up. Until then, we're flogging a dead horse.

And it died about three months back.

The same with the palm tree argument. I saw what 11 11 pointed out; however, I can understand that it may not be convincing enough for most others. A picture of a speck of light to you might be incontrovertible proof of intelligent alien life to me; what you think doesn't change what I saw. It is up to me to convince you with something other than the poor image.

Apologies in advance if I have upset anyone. On with it!


reply posted on 11-8-2007 @ 11:22 PM by Mr Jackdaw
Originally posted by danx
I noticed something on the second video (the so called '
Dominican Republic' video). At around 5 or 6 seconds into the video a craft passes in front of the sun.

I created two sets of images with the respective frame numbers:

set 1 (frames 172, 173 & 174)

set 2 (frames 183, 185 & 187)

Even though the sun is of a considerable size, how come the craft seems to block the light from the sun on frame 174 and yet fails to do so on the frames of set 2?

Shouldn't the frames of set 1 show the similar effect of the sun as it's shown in set 2?


I just viewed both photos and (thanks to Firefox), I was able to switch between tabs. Although accidental at first, it afforded me a view of the ship's position. In frames 183, 185 and 187, the "craft" is in a different position. Observe too how the sun affects the tree in front of it - the tree beside the object. This may account for the different way the object interacts with the light.


reply posted on 11-8-2007 @ 11:29 PM by maybereal11
What I would like to see is some form of protocol for debunking this fodder. As we can cleary see CGI is getting better and more accessable. My worry is that black program operatives have a clear advantage here.

After I found a palm tree at the start of each of the two vids, Haiti and Dom Republic that matched I thought done. Hoax. A little embaressed I gave it time, even after Wildone spotted the duplicate palms at the end of the Haiti video I thought maybe its just an oddity of nature...But after I saw the two palms in different videos I thought done. Hoax.

But then lying in bed I began to think how Black Op Programs or special access programs in the us government are directed not just to deny the existence of a given operation or program, but also to conduct disinfo. To provide misleading and innacurate information to make any revealed evidence appear a hoax, innaccurate or witnesses not credible. They are directed to do so. There are public documents that specify this. This is how these operations work. So I was lying there in bed thinking what if some operative cloned the Palm from the first video that might have been genuine and planted it multiple times in the second for the sake of discrediting the evidence? In the end I think hoax, but the question remains...disinformation is standard practice with SAPs, so we really need to be thorough and thoughtful in analysis. Again, I think we have a hoax here and possibly some marketing for the program used, but we have also demonstrated to whoever is watching how to discredit/debunk evidence. It is a tutorial for anyone that specializes in disinformation. Ditto Isaac/caret.

The question is...Do we have a thorough and regimented process to allow for the real deal to survive when disinfo is thrown on top of a genuine sighting? Just an intellectual excersise. This of course is a hoax Even if we haven't thought about it, I am sure that there are those in the shadows of our government who are getting better at there trade.



reply posted on 11-8-2007 @ 11:37 PM by danx
Originally posted by Mr Jackdaw
In frames 183, 185 and 187, the "craft" is in a different position. Observe too how the sun affects the tree in front of it - the tree beside the object. This may account for the different way the object interacts with the light.


It looks like the sun glare effect gets blocked when the craft is blocking the center of the sun.

I created a new set:
set 3 (frames 180, 181 & 182).

Can you see a difference of position between frames 181 and 182?

I understand that something passing in front of the sun is gonna affect the light/create some shadows on the ground or objects, but what about the glare effect?

The sun is so big in comparison to the craft, shouldn't the effect we see on set 2 be seen on all the other frames? Unless of course the craft was blocking the whole sun.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.


reply posted on 12-8-2007 @ 12:13 AM by LordBaskettIV
Originally posted by LordBaskettIV
Yawn, too bad those "palm trees" are just the basic palms from "Vue" by eon software. And oh snap, the program can be synced up with any highend software. Oh and that program can simulate wind real easy too.

Vue by eon software



I brought attention to the "Vue" angle on page 33, I guess my responce and tone was too forward?

After wildone brought attention to the trees being cloned, the shape of them seemed sooo familiar.Thats when it hit, I see this tree all the time in other cgi artists pics in the Vue gallery over at "Renderosity.com". I was interested in the app for a while, but it's poor memory management and spotty stability was a big turn off. Rendering something at that size wouldn't take long really, i also suspect its made in version 4 or 5 of Vue. If they had a version with the "eco-system" function, the tress would have had more variations leaf wise and the only things to go off of(to show that its a hoax) would be all the blatant lighting glitches and bad(wobble) in the tracking visible at the start. A "real" civilization would send a emmisary or some such for first contact, or attack all out...I mean a flyby of a tourist beach...lol.

[edit on 12-8-2007 by LordBaskettIV]
Pages: <<  38    39    40    41    42    43    44  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO in Riga, Latvia?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
Empty Plane Theory
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama\'s College Classmate Speaks Out!!!!
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Machu Picchu: Hidden face?
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Possible alien at Russian Machine plant ?
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Massive US Troop Movements In California Raise Russian Concerns
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Ghost in kitchen - [HOAX]
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags
KISSFM Records Strange Noise
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 14 hours ago, 102 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 15 hours ago, 73 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 29 replies
Whitney Houston dead at 48
  Breaking General News, Posted 13 hours ago, 27 replies