Originally posted by AlphaHumana
Originally posted by Astyanax
language is not an instrument of control; it is an instrument of liberation.
It's not always used in such a way - the clearest example that comes to mind is the RCC's corruption of Latin. This made it so the commoners and even the more learned class could not read the Bible themselves and had to rely on the interpretations (ahem, "control") of the clergy...
...and we all know what happened to Christianity once people were able to read the Bible for themselves {in their own language}...
Actually, we're in exact agreement, AlphaHumana
The first line of my previous post was
When language is used as an instrument of control, the control is usually exercised by restricting access to the language.
Your post gives an example of that restriction (preventing access to the Bible by lay persons who couldn't read church Latin), followed by an example of how language works in its natural function as an instrument of liberation.
If the common folk had been able to read church Latin, the Reformation may have happened earlier. Or it may never have happened, the perceived need for it not having arisen.

