It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thestatue
your not getting the point major natural is God created the earth supernatural is this big bang evolution non sense.....they also are new very very new well from my point of view at least. nine thousand years ago no one thought they would be accused of being decended from an animal and it baffles me that you think cause someone calls something proof it must be proof there is no proof of evolution.there is plenty of evidence for God its just to wide spread there are modern day miracles that defy the faux-science all together God is the god of science he made all things including those rules man just kinda made new ones so man could be better comforted and find a way to gain control.the faux-science you may follow is flawed and just helps it's self but inventing new ways for itself to be validated God doesnt change.poeple have all kind of problems with God but he doesnt change.if someone has a major problem with science they can just make a new theory.i'm sorry but i can only believe in something that makes the same sense it did ten thousand years ago.some new mojo hojo theroized faux science would require a tremendous amount of faith and strength to try and believe in something like it
We are young children in a giant's garden
Originally posted by Rev_Godslapper
Sorry Wraoth, I'm a much better speaker than typer. But, yeah, I believe that right and wrong are subjective. I also think that we know more about religion and science than you're giving us credit for. At least more than we did a thousand years ago.
The debate between religion and science doesn't need to stop, the way we debate needs to change. We need to think exactly the way you indicated in your first post.
We are young children in a giant's garden
We need to put our egos aside and assume we are wrong. But that's easier said than done, I guess.
Originally posted by Quazga
Originally posted by Rev_Godslapper
Sorry Wraoth, I'm a much better speaker than typer. But, yeah, I believe that right and wrong are subjective. I also think that we know more about .
Wow, I've never heard it put as eloquently. Thanks GodSlapper! I wholeheartedly agree!
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Originally posted by Quazga
Originally posted by Rev_Godslapper
Sorry Wraoth, I'm a much better speaker than typer. But, yeah, I believe that right and wrong are subjective. I also think that we know more about .
Wow, I've never heard it put as eloquently. Thanks GodSlapper! I wholeheartedly agree!
Ummm he was agreeing with what I said.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Science is not a religion.
That's because science is real. It is a fact. Religion is a belief.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Sorry MajorMalfunction ... but for many people Science IS a religion. The persuit of fact ... the worship of science .... ALL religions are cults and for many science is a cult.
Oh man .... Evolution MAY be real, or it may not be. It's a theory.
Religious beliefs ARE many times real. There are beliefs and theory and false leads and reality in both science AND religion.
Trying to say that science isn't a religion to some based on those reasons gets kinda soupy ... ya' know?
I still think Einstein got it right ... one without the other is blind and/or lame. Science AND religion both get myopic ...