It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Schmidt1989
Plus I think it's actually possible, too.
Originally posted by saintnuke
If they could make I dinosaur, I am sure they would for military purposes. I dunno how many bullets it would take to kill a t-rex for instance, or what calibre bullet could even pierce it for that matter, but an army of t-rexs roaming around the desert in afganistan would probobly discover where those sneaky little terrorists are hiding. It would also make a good first strike plan against Iran.
Originally posted by Dan5647
If we were capable of extracting DNA from old dinosaur bones and resurrect them, would it be a good idea to build a park like in the movie Jurassic Park? Or maybe put them on a deserted island somewhere out in the Pacific and let them adapt to the environment for our studying purposes. Would this be a positive or a negative thing to do?
Originally posted by squiz
There's a problem with the jurassic park idea, It's impossible for large dinosaurs to exist today. The only answer is gravity would have had to have been much weaker. Expanding Earth perhaps or gravity isn't what we think it is?
Also there may have been a higher concentration of oxygen.
Originally posted by iori_komei
It's not impossible for them to exist today, they just could'nt exist everywhere.
Catastrophist Ted Holden has resurrected the controversy by examining the relationship of size, weight, and strength in animals. (His analysis was the basis for a documentary televised in Japan in Feb, 2004. See photo above.) The strength of muscle tissue is fairly constant among all species. Strength is proportional to the cross section of the muscle: If one muscle is two times the diameter of another, the first will be four times (the square of two) as strong. But weight increases with the volume: A muscle that's twice as big will weigh eight times (the cube of two) as much.
Holden computed the weight/strength ratio of a well-trained human weightlifter and scaled it up to the size of a dinosaur. The weightlifter soon became too big to lift his own weight. Strength, in its relationship with weight, imposes a limit on size. Holden's calculations indicate that the heaviest elephants of today approach that limit.
Originally posted by meurig
What would we learn? How it walked, or communicated or mated.
What benefit would the world of today get except for curiosity.
We are not going to learn anything useful like a new form of fuel, medicine or space travel
Originally posted by meurig
What would we learn? How it walked, or communicated or mated.
What benefit would the world of toda
Originally posted by Dan5647
I don't think man ate dinosaurs when they existed at the same time. Also, I wouldn't want to eat a dinosaur that lived 100 million years ago. Do we eat elephants? No. I would rather cherish and study what our technology has created instead of destroying and eating it.
Originally posted by squiz
It's impossible for large dinosaurs to exist today. The only answer is gravity would have had to have been much weaker. Expanding Earth perhaps or gravity isn't what we think it is?
dinosaurtheory.com...
Also there may have been a higher concentration of oxygen.
news.nationalgeographic.com...
Originally posted by apex
One slight problem with that. In order for earths gravity to have been weaker, it would have needed bigger volume with the same mass, or less mass in the same volume. Both major problems. And if gravity's fundamental constant had changed so it is now stronger, it would have made severe problems with the stars etc.