It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New World Order a redundent term??

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 8 2007 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Just wanted to draw people's attention to the following comment.

rense.com...


Exert from Chinese Secret Society Challeges Illuminati by Henry Makow PhD
Benjamin Fulford - "Until two years ago the plan was the New World Order. That was outlined pretty clearly in the Project For A New American Century. However, with the debacle in Iraq, the secret government of the West changed to a new plan that is a world government based on the EU. To do this they will sabotage the US economy."


Should we in the research community cease using the term NWO or New World Order?

I know Fulford is essentially discussing the same type of scenario but, really, it's no longer the NWO.



Also interesting to focus on Fulford's last line, then check this thread about the so-called "financial nucleur bomb" the Chinese are threatening the US with...
www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Aug, 8 2007 @ 08:23 AM
link   
I think my opnion differ in his conclusion. IMO, whatever economic powers are out there, will shift their International Finance Capital to China. For both the economic and military benefits. The way I see it, China is the next super power, the next austerity policy enforcer, the next weapon against the people.



new topics
 
1

log in

join