I have been looking at the pictures from that collapsed bridge in Minneapolis, one thing that I noticed was it looked like a natural collapse in that nothing was put in place specifically to make that happen.
Large steel beams severely bent, large pieces of concrete, although tragic it looked natural.

Compare that to 9/11 the WTC collapse, it does not look like a natural collapse; starting, during and after. Where are all the concrete peices in relation to the size of the building that just fell?
Where are all the bent peices of steel there should have been thousands of pieces of BENT & TWISTED steel??? We see steel but it is straight in most pictures

When you compare the 2 scenerio's one looks ugly but correct, the other looks horrid and incorrect.



[edit on 6-8-2007 by Blue_Jay33]

Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
I have been looking at the pictures from that collapsed bridge in Minneapolis, one thing that I noticed was it looked like a natural collapse in that nothing was put in place specifically to make that happen.
Large steel beams severely bent, large pieces of concrete, although tragic it looked natural.

Compare that to 9/11 the WTC collapse, it does not look like a natural collapse; starting, during and after. Where are all the concrete peices in relation to the size of the building that just fell?
Where are all the bent peices of steel there should have been thousands of pieces of BENT & TWISTED steel??? We see steel but it is straight in most pictures

When you compare the 2 scenerio's one looks ugly but correct, the other looks horrid and incorrect.



[edit on 6-8-2007 by Blue_Jay33]

The problem is that neither the colapsed bridge looks like a natural colapse.

But shure, ther is no comparison.

9 /11 is clearly an inside job.