FBI raids DOJ attorney's home in search for warrantless wiretap, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times
Topic started on 6-8-2007 @ 07:26 AM by brill
The controversy over President Bush's warrantless surveillance program took another surprise turn last week when a team of FBI agents, armed with a classified search warrant, raided the suburban Washington home of a former Justice Department lawyer. The lawyer, Thomas M. Tamm, previously worked in Justice's Office of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR)—the supersecret unit that oversees surveillance of terrorist and espionage targets.


src
www.msnbc.msn.com...

Classified search warrant? OK so we have a former justice department lawyer who they 'suspect' may have been the individual responsible or leaking Bush's warrantless surveillance agenda. Are classified search warrants a common course of action? If so, then why not just classify ALL warrants then nobody can question the intent or authority. Bush continues to rape the freedoms of individuals on an unprecedented level. All we need now are jackboots. I applaud those who expose current and past governments for their shady and despicable tactics, fronted with the notion that its all for the better.

How can it be argued when nobody, except those in high authority, knows the true details and can exercise absolute power.

brill

[edit on 6-8-2007 by brill]


reply posted on 6-8-2007 @ 09:59 AM by tyranny22
This is great. I know it's not directly related to this subject, but I was discussing this in another thread. It is somewhat related, being that the subject worked for the Justice's Office of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR), who would actually be using these new laws that state:

Spy Laws Article
The laws would "allow the NSA warrantless access to virtually all international communications of Americans with anyone outside the US, so long as the Government declared that the surveillance was directed at people, which includes foreigners and citizens, reasonably believed to be located outside the US."


Note that it doesn't state that they must PROVE they're outside the United State. Just thought to be outside our borders. So, actually they can just say, "Well, we had reason to believe ... but, now we know we had bad information. Oh well."

I'm just glad that the people who're making and using these laws are feeling the heat from them.

Granted this wasn't related to terrorism and it wasn't a "warrantless" raid, but somehow I feel there's a connection with the invasion of privacy and the peole that are allowing these unconstitutional laws to pass.

Oh, the irony! This whole mess was aboout a leak, yet:
But two legal sources who asked not to be identified talking about an ongoing case told NEWSWEEK the raid was related to a Justice criminal probe into who leaked details of the warrantless eavesdropping program to the news media.


[edit on 6-8-2007 by tyranny22]


reply posted on 6-8-2007 @ 06:27 PM by Syntaxstealth

Spy Laws Article
The laws would "allow the NSA warrantless access to virtually all international communications of Americans with anyone outside the US, so long as the Government declared that the surveillance was directed at people, which includes foreigners and citizens, reasonably believed to be located outside the US."


Well at least i know the work around. i'll connect myself to the service in US while outside in China then use VOIP on the same line. it would be as if im making a call from the US. problem solved an no need to worry about them listening to my calls.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 13 days ago with 81 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 9 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 3 days ago with 48 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 10 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 5 days ago with 33 member flags