Originally posted by Bhadhidar
2.) How would the supposed "terrorists" the government would finger as the perpetrators of such a heinous act, have acquired a working
nuke?
If the US Government stages a false flag nuclear attack, their options are limited.
They can't use a military nuke. Even if they were able to somehow keep the material from being traced, the ratio of the yield to the wasted material
would be wrong for an ameteur-built nuke. They'll need a real live home-made nuke to be dirty and small enough.
And where will they get someone to build it who is too stupid to figure out what the government would want with a home made nuke?
They'll have to help a real live terrorist, like they probably did on 9/11.
And then where will they get a uranium that makes sense? They can't steal it from most foreign sources because if that operation fails the terrorists
will be interrogated, they will name their backers, and those backers will be traced to the US Government.
The last thing they need is the Russians catching somebody trying to buy blackmarket nuclear material or weapons and finding out that the transaction
was brokered by a known CIA agent.
So what nuclear material would "make sense" that the US can get its hands on?
North Korea's. We got them to shut Yongbyon back down in exchange for oil. But George Bush shut the oil shipments off when Yongbyon was already shut
down because he was concerned about other undeclared programs. So why are we suddenly admitting "oh, we misread the intelligence, that's not a major
concern, we just want those reactors shut down"?
Maybe because if the chain of custody for that material involves the US, we can swap some of the material for other material- that will be disposed of
without its source being tested- and then we announce a discrepency in the quantity which is too small to develop a nuke from (when in fact we did
steal enough for a bomb, but hid that by swapping some of our own material in there).
Our terrorists build the bomb, make the false flag op, and since there's not enough missing to account for a bomb, the only explanation for North
Korean nuclear material being identified as the fuel for the bomb is that North Korea kept some of its material and sold it to Iran, who in turn sold
it to terrorists.
That would explain the recent disinfo about a US sub supposedly sinking a North Korean ship carrying nuclear material to Iran.
But all of that, if I'm correct, would mean that they don't yet have a bomb for the job, so it's not gonna happen on the 6th.