It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shadow watcher
The program was awful. It never fully explained any of the theories presented. There was no debate between the 2 sides. It basically was done to make the theorists look insane and make the magazine editor look like an expert. I guess we cannot expect anything more when one of the sponsors was the U.S. Marines. How can there be a fair debate when the sponsors are the very government that is in question. I understand that the military is not neccessarily the government, but it sure is close enough to keep things skewed.
Originally posted by PriapismJoe
It would have to be a 22 hour show to go in depth, they used expert's and had them give their opinions. Why do you take a truck drivers word over an engineers?
Originally posted by Vinadetta
I think my favorite part of the program is when they were talking about Flight 93. They stated that the plane's impact was so hard that it turned "liquid metal" and that it pretty much vaporized all that metal and steel. Then a few minutes later they claim that they were able to identify human remains. WTF!!! Seriously, unless everyone on that airplane was Wolverine from X-Men there is no way the plane could melt, and still identify human remains!!! I'm sick and tired of that BS!!!!!
That was a nasty hit peice and I hope that someone out there puts together a response like they did with the BBC hit piece. They made anyone who questions the offical story to be some self serving person with out disregard for facts. All we are doing is calling the government out, and saying that they have holes in their offical story, and we demand a truly independent investigation. No matter how hard they try, this movement will continue to grow!!!!
Originally posted by SwatMedic
Loose change was shredded..again...and even the Loose Change guys are starting to change their story and backing off from what were initailly keynote issues.
Originally posted by C0le
Thats the thing though man, it didn't prove much of anything, this show did what most truthers do, say something without proving it.
they made a lot of claims no different then that of the truthers, and in general responses to every claim was "they are wrong we are right" with no proof...
Originally posted by sp00ner
You mean the expert's commenting on their respective fields... it's astounding what some people hold as proof for one side and not the other... When a Theologist and highschool student disagree with a demolitions expert, I'm gonna have to take the word of the man that works with the stuff daily vs the guys that watched some video for "anomolies".