It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Rare-New Evidence Of Controlled Demo?

page: 5
30
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
I have posted photos of the men cutting the beams at ground zero!! So has about 50 other members.


Yes. And those workers were on cherry pickers. For someone to cut the "famous" beam, you'd have to be 8 feet tall unless you were on a picker. Why bring in a picker when you could have just stood there and cut? Why even cut at all at this point in time? Wouldn't it be prudent to clean the area (say maybe for survivors) before they start to cut columns?




posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutoftheSky
After viewing this video www.metacafe.com...

I WAS CONVINCED OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.



and this one is older, focus primarily on one particular upward diagonal demoliton sequence.
www.webfives.com...

but this one www.metacafe.com...
shows more


[edit on 2-8-2007 by OutoftheSky]



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Postal76
Hmm. I think I may see the "flashes" that you mention, but I don't see how that's evidence of controlled demolition. I see maybe 2 flashes, spaced far apart. If this was a controlled demo job, wouldn't there be lots of flashes?

And if 9/11 was an inside job, why would the pentagon be hit too? It seems completely unnecessary for our government to attack the heart of our government.


The Pentagon was hit in an area that was being reconstructed to withstand a missile. That's why it was hit. Nobody was in that section of the building when it happened and that was the only section of the pentagon under construction at the time. coincidence? i think not.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by RandomThought
Here it is, your molten material, AKA the WTC Meteor, composed of molten steel and concrete. Yup Molten steel.


Please provide me with proof that that "meteor" was made up of molten steel. Thank you



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainObvious

Originally posted by RandomThought
Here it is, your molten material, AKA the WTC Meteor, composed of molten steel and concrete. Yup Molten steel.


Please provide me with proof that that "meteor" was made up of molten steel. Thank you


Look at it. The proof is right there geez, how stubborn can you be?



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by RandomThought
Nobody was in that section of the building when it happened and that was the only section of the pentagon under construction at the time. coincidence? i think not.


WHAT????? NObody was in that section???? This is the kind of post that not only proves that some in here are NOT in it for the truth, but makes me ill.

RandomThought.. would you like a link to the Mousoui Trial exhibits that show charred bodies from the Pentagon??



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by RandomThought


Look at it. The proof is right there geez, how stubborn can you be?


I am looking at it... I have seen it. There is many different material inside that,...many.... has it been tested to PROVE there was molten STEEL inside it?? I can tell you... 100%.... No there hasn't. Please post the picture in here with an outline to where you see the molten steel.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainObvious


Um.... no other building near by were damaged??? WHAT?


I have posted photos of the men cutting the beams at ground zero!! So has about 50 other members.



well when 1368ft of metal and concrete collapses you would expect the building around it to go with it...and why would the men at ground zero cut the beams diagonally? to catch really really really big vampires?

i notices you "debunkers" ignored the freefall comment earlier...i'll say it again...for something to fall at freefall speeds it must encounter...NO RESISTANCE!...the WTC(all 3of them) fell at free fall speeds...FREEE FAAALLL SPEEEDDDSSSSSS...am i getting through to you at all?

the pancake effect would have encountered resistance every floor on the way down and the decent would have slowed considerably by the time it hit the bottom! for it to have fallen at the speeds it did, something would have had to have knocked the resistance out of teh way, now what force can move large ammounts of material very quickly?

next, building 7...not hit by a plane, only a couple of fires, collapses in EXACTLY the same manner as the other 2 buildings? does anyone have a lightbulb?



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainObvious

Originally posted by RandomThought
Nobody was in that section of the building when it happened and that was the only section of the pentagon under construction at the time. coincidence? i think not.


WHAT????? NObody was in that section???? This is the kind of post that not only proves that some in here are NOT in it for the truth, but makes me ill.

RandomThought.. would you like a link to the Mousoui Trial exhibits that show charred bodies from the Pentagon??



I didn;t see that, so if it's true then i stand corrected. Still doesn't make sense that the only part of the pentagon hit, happened to be the part under construction for that very same kind of attack.

You should learn to relax, I can tell you are getting frustrated just by how you type just because people wont listen to you. With a name like CaptianObvious, you sure are ignoring the obvious.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:54 PM
link   



I am looking at it... I have seen it. There is many different material inside that,...many.... has it been tested to PROVE there was molten STEEL inside it?? I can tell you... 100%.... No there hasn't. Please post the picture in here with an outline to where you see the molten steel.



HAS IT BEEN TESTED...NO IT HAS NOT...and why is that?



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Griff
Wouldn't it be prudent to clean the area (say maybe for survivors) before they start to cut columns?


I guess this would depend on what the day the picture was taken to determine if there was still a search and rescue operation on going...or it was a recovery mission.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 03:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZGhorus



HAS IT BEEN TESTED...NO IT HAS NOT...and why is that?


sorry... who has the rights to it? Contact them and ask them why.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:04 PM
link   
okay that was an attempt to make you ask yourself the same question...the reason it was never tested is the same reason despite the fact that several of the "suicide bombers" are still alive and cant fly a plane, the FBI still hasnt updated its list of terrorists...because they dont want people like us asking too many questions...have you noticed that since the us school system became government sponsored that the grades have reduced?



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by RandomThought
The Pentagon was hit in an area that was being reconstructed to withstand a missile. That's why it was hit. Nobody was in that section of the building when it happened and that was the only section of the pentagon under construction at the time. coincidence? i think not.


You didn't really answer my question. That doesn't explain WHY our government would attack the pentagon as well. I can't see why it would be necessary; hitting the WTC would be enough motivation to go to war.

Also, if you look it up, I'm pretty sure around 125 people died in the pentagon attack (not including people on the plane).



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:10 PM
link   
the pentagon is a well known military building and its importance to america as a whole is well documented in pretty much every action movie...makes the idea of a terrorist attack more plausible



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:22 PM
link   
I agree, those explosions really go against what the official story says.

The core columns which were solid steal were controlled demolitioned. So yes, the core columns were demo'd 1ST after and during the plane attacks after a slow demo sequence then yanking the top floors inwards like a wreaking ball.


Then i watched this www.metacafe.com...

This video shows the creation of the spire by means of controlled demolition.

If one were to refute the controlled demo claim, then i would have to ask, Why and how did the solid steel core columns break on 110 floors? www.metacafe.com... n

[edit on 2-8-2007 by OutoftheSky]



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:43 PM
link   
i'm off to get drunk, and with the speed you guys attack this forum i figure this will be dead in an archive by the time i get back on here so i'll say this now as a closing statement...

"they must find it difficult... those who have accepted authority as the truth rather than truth as the authority" - G. massey.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:49 PM
link   
i more and more get to believe that the 9/11 was not just osame sends terorist to make terorist act.
they captured sadam right?they have satelites up there that can find my baby teeth and they havent found osama?LOL
and when people sayd why not attack the white house it will humiliate america but the trade center?
i beggin to wonder more
what u think.....president makign this so he can have a reason to attack and control the recources in iraq?or maybe not the president?some other organizacion?some organization that hates iraq?
or some organizacion that want the oil to be in america's hands?
its really easy when u start resolving the problem with simple questions



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 04:52 PM
link   
I had someone tell me that the reason for evidence of thermate is because the fire burned the aluminum facing.

I think that the truth debunker's would entertain a OBL and E.T theory before admitting to the truth.

I think that they are really just scared and think that they are safe as long as they don't admit it.



posted on Aug, 2 2007 @ 05:02 PM
link   


For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not .lined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.


President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
New York City, April 27, 1961

We lost they won. and sadly for the remainder of our lives we will have to deal with it.



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join