It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Adobe Installs Secret Software Technology For Feds

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2004 @ 01:00 AM
link   
"If I were the paranoid-conspiracy type, I would speculate that since it's not Adobe's software, what else is it doing?"

WASHINGTON (AP) - Adobe Systems Inc. acknowledged Friday it quietly added technology to the world's best-known graphics software at the request of government regulators and international bankers to prevent consumers from making copies of the world's major currencies.

The unusual concession has angered scores of customers.

Adobe, the world's leading vendor for graphics software, said the secretive technology "would have minimal impact on honest customers." It generates a warning message when someone tries to make digital copies of some currencies.

The U.S. Federal Reserve and other organizations that worked on the technology said they could not disclose how it works and would not name which other software companies include it in their products. They cited concerns that counterfeiters would try to defeat it.

"We sort of knew this would come out eventually," Adobe spokesman Russell Brady said. "We can't really talk about the technology itself."

A Microsoft Corp. spokesman, Jim Desler, said the technology was not built into versions of its dominant Windows operating system.

Rival graphics software by Taiwan-based Ulead Systems Inc. also blocks customers from making copies of currency.

Experts said the decision by Adobe represents one of the rare occasions when the U.S. technology industry has agreed to include third-party software code into commercial products at the request of government and finance officials.

Adobe revealed it added the technology after a customer complained in an online support forum about mysterious behavior by the new $649 "Photoshop CS" software when opening an image of a U.S. $20 bill.

Kevin Connor, Adobe's product management director, said the company did not disclose the technology at the request of international bankers. He said Adobe may add the detection mechanism to its other products.

"The average consumer is never going to encounter this in their daily use," Connor said. "It just didn't seem like something meaningful to communicate."

Angry customers have flooded Adobe's Internet message boards with complaints about censorship and concerns over future restrictions on other types of images, such as copyrighted or adult material.

"I don't believe this. This shocks me," said Stephen M. Burns, president of the Photoshop users group in San Diego. "Artists don't like to be limited in what they can do with their tools. Let the U.S. government or whoever is involved deal with this, but don't take the powers of the government and place them into a commercial software package."

Connor said the company's decision to use the technology was "not a step down the road towards Adobe becoming Big Brother."

Adobe said the technology slows its software's performance "just a fraction of a second" and urged customers to report unexpected glitches. It said there may be room for improvement.

The technology was designed recently by the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group, a consortium of 27 central banks in the United States, England, Japan, Canada and across the European Union, where there already is a formal proposal to require all software companies to include similar anti-counterfeit technology.

"The industry has been very open to understanding the nature of the problem," said Richard Wall, the Bank of Canada's representative to the counterfeit deterrence group. "We're very happy with the response."

Some policy experts were divided on the technology. Bruce Schneier, an expert on security and privacy, praised the anti-counterfeit technology.

Another security expert, Gene Spafford of Purdue University, said Adobe should have notified its customers prominently. He wondered how closely Adobe was permitted to study the technology's inner-workings to ensure it was stable and performed as advertised.

"If I were the paranoid-conspiracy type, I would speculate that since it's not Adobe's software, what else is it doing?" Spafford said.

ON THE NET

Adobe Systems: www.adobe.com
Facts about banknote images: www.rulesforuse.org
Bureau of Engraving & Printing: www.moneyfactory.com

www.rense.com...




posted on Jan, 13 2004 @ 07:29 AM
link   
Well, I wonder if Macromedia Fireworks & Corel Paint have this technology embedded in their software as well...
I personally find Adobe Photoshop more intuitive to my needs, but have seen good things from these other 2 programs as well.
I think if either of these alternative softwares did not have this spy ware embedded it could be a great selling point.


[Edited on 13-1-2004 by intelgurl]



posted on Jan, 13 2004 @ 08:46 AM
link   
What I found to be most important about this is that the government has already forced companies to add something to their software, and did not tell the customers.

Think back to the Microsoft trial. The idea was circled of splitting MS. Then it all seemed to just go away.

I can image 'them' sitting with Bill and saying

"This, and this, and this you will put in your new OS, unles you would rather we destroy your company...."

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by ArchAngel]



posted on Jan, 13 2004 @ 09:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by ArchAngel
What I found to be most important about this is that the government has already forced companies to add something to their software, and did not tell the customers.

Think back to the Microsoft trial. The idea was circled of splitting MS. Then it all seemed to just go away.

I can image 'them' sitting with Bill and saying

"This, and this, and this you will put in your new OS, unles you would rather we destroy your company...."

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by ArchAngel]

Good observation - I had not thought of why all that just "went away"...
hmmm.... Let's see, I think I have a copy of Red Hat and Star Office somewhere in my closet... I think it's time for that change I've been wanting to make but was just too lazy to act on ~



posted on Jan, 13 2004 @ 09:42 AM
link   
I plan to change to Linux after I get a puter with a 64bit CPU.

I still use Win98 because I do not trust XP, and 2K is only slower and crashes more often. But now MS is dropping support for 98. Soon enough there will be exploits found by hackers that MS will not fix. It will not be long before I, and others are forced to move to something supported. I may switch to 2K for a short while if needed, but my plan is for an Athlon64 with Linux. I will dual boot with windows-whatever for games only though.

Plan to keep a close eye on that drive.....



new topics

top topics
 
1

log in

join