It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO - NASA STS 114. undoubtedly the best, ice crystals? HA!!

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 7 2008 @ 09:32 AM
link   
Ha. Cool


Cheers for checking it out guys


They're still not working for me though
Still says "not available" and yet I get sound?


Very strange, I think my computer might need some maintanance


Cheers again guys


AoN




posted on Aug, 7 2008 @ 01:44 PM
link   
Has anyone checked out the sts-80 tape? I dont know how to put it up from you tube to here, if any idea let me know. This is a very interesting footage.



posted on Aug, 7 2008 @ 01:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by lookfortruth
Has anyone checked out the sts-80 tape? I dont know how to put it up from you tube to here, if any idea let me know. This is a very interesting footage.


You take just the number between the = and the & from search

QRzOF-eAw7I

Click on the youtube button and paste the number




posted on Aug, 7 2008 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chupa101
That last 'object' clearly reduces its speed to a halt, then moves backwards, against its original trajectory. That is very odd indeed.

This can only surely only mean 1 of 3 things:

1. Its man-made.
2. Its a fluke of nature.
3. Its ET-made.



Why has no one even considered the most likely possibility? The shuttle moved. The orbiter routinely makes small corrections with its forward RCS. If a small particle is floating close to the orbiter and the shuttle makes a small thruster firing in translational mode, what will it look like? It will appear that the particle is changing speed and possibly direction as well. It doesn't look like the shuttle is moving because you have no other points of reference and the orbiter's movements do not induce camera shake. The earth is too far away and the change in velocity is too small to notice any difference in the way the earth is moving below the spacecraft, so that is a "false" point of reference.



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 02:10 AM
link   
reply to post by ngchunter
 


Ok. Really short answer coz im going to bed.


I know what your talking about, but look at tyhe speed it passes OTHER objects in the frame AS the camera moves to the left!!!

It actually EXCEEDS the speed of the camera, it 'accellerates'.

Watch it a few times more, that motion is in NO way consistant with how the camera moves.

But hey, "each to thier own" and all that


Cheers


AoN

EDITED TO ADD:



Why has no one even considered the most likely possibility? The shuttle moved.


This is actually quite insulting, I'm not FIVE
. Thats the FIRST bloody thing anyone serious about this subject looks at.




Cheers

AoN



[edit on 10-8-2008 by Anomic of Nihilism]



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter The shuttle moved.


you have GOT to be kidding right? So much for "deny ignorance"

:shk:



new topics

top topics
 
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join