UFO - NASA STS 114. undoubtedly the best, ice crystals? HA!!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 1-11-2007 @ 11:04 AM by zorgon
Originally posted by Postal76
Sorry, but this video is hardly convincing, in part due to its poor quality.



DOH!!! That's because its INFRARED footage... most of the NASA 'UFO' films are taken in INFRARED



If NASA sees UFOs zipping around all the time, they have done a great job keeping it from the public, so I don't see why they'd make it so easy to obtain this footage.


Yes they have but they show us them because skeptics like you have no problem believing that ICE CRYSTALS can slow down and change direction...

the ice crystal explanation is perfectly plausible. That could be the case here too, but it could also be space debris or satellites as someone else suggested.


Its all well and good to be a skeptic, but you have to at least know what your talking about so you don't look the fool. The thing stops and REVERSES... It does not turn... Not even a satellite or any KNOWN spacecraft of ours can perform such a maneuver.



What makes you think it is something of extraterrestrial origin let alone intelligently controlled?


I don't... I KNOW they are 'critters' and so does NASA and they are always recorded in IR because they are only rarely visible in natural light



Yeah I know you want proof.... don't worry its on its way....

Breaking News....

Wednesday, October 31, 2007
U.S. scientists unveil NASA’s secrets about cities on the Moon and microbes on Mars

The former manager of the Data and Photo Control Department at NASA’s Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo Lunar Program, Ken Johnston, has released quite a number of sensational statements recently in the USA. The specialist said that U.S. astronauts found ancient ruins of artificial origin and a previously unknown technology to control gravitation when then landed on the Moon. Astronauts took pictures of the objects that they found, but NASA ordered Johnston to destroy the images. Johnston did not follow the order. He said that the U.S. government had been keeping this information a secret for 40 years.


SOURCE


reply posted on 1-11-2007 @ 04:56 PM by wierdalienshiznit
Originally posted by Alex Krycek
Ok well after page one I was afraid there would be noone in this thread other than the OMG THATS ITS THATS PROOF hardcore believers.

(I try to stay in the middle and as the first really well phrased point about skepticism goes, I too am always very skeptical, but also always purusing these boards and hoping there will someday be that ok, spaceship landed, little green men came out, said hi, everyone saw it, case-closed-aliens-exist-and-aren't-we-dumb-that-we-thought-all-that-space-and-we-were-the-only-ones moment).

When I first saw the object moving right to left, and stopping, I had a WOW moment, for real. It is quite bright, which to me indicated:

1.larger size or,
2. Possibly its own light source or
3. Its quite close to the camera, in which case if its close enough it would appear quite large even tho its quite small.

The problem is, by the end of the video I see the problem with believing this is anything other than ___ (I wont say that because the Op asked me not use that word :p) or other random debris.

Everyone is (rightly so) harping on the fact that it stops and changes direction. This is typically one of the best signs of something that has its own propulsion, and counters what the laws of physics would do to an uncontrolled object of debris.

HOWEVER

The problem with that is that the camera starts moving.

When this object is moving right to left at a good clip, the camera is still.
However the camera then starts to pan, slowly at first and then quickly, down and to the left.
It is at this time that the object in question starts 'slowing down', then 'stops' then starts 'moving' in (you guessed it) the exact opposite direction of the camera movement, up and right.
The movement is exactly parallel in speed, and exactly opposite in direction.

This makes sense, in that objects closer to the camera seem to move much faster in relation to movement of the camera, than would the far-away Earth.

Great find on this video, it had me rather excited for a moment(I too tend to prefer the alien ship in space clips, maybe because you seem to get sharper images in the thinner atmospheres, makes things look more real).

However for me this object is no longer totally unidentified. I don't know what kind of debris it is, but it's debris.

[edit on 1-8-2007 by Alex Krycek]


surely if its a result of panning,why this is the only object out of the many that behaves in this way?,It shows utterly different vectors to them..

And if you claim it is ultra close to camera,the panning you talk about would have removed the said object from the view of the camera very early on.


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 11:28 PM by Duzey
reply to post by Anomic of Nihilism



They all work fine for me. Whatever the problem was, it's all fixed now.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags