It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Methuselah
if the process is not so random, it had to be designed. you cant get a process out of randomness. you get patterns, but you dont get a process. just like moving water sorting particles into layers... it that a process? no its simply a pattern we see in the flow of water with particles.
yep and that process had to come together somehow, they produce organic chemicals??? ok, but I dont think you get an organism in a star... its a little too hot for that.
oh and btw, you can only get so many chemicals from stars... not all of them.
natural selection only works if you have things to select from... natural selection does nothing more than selects. it does change anything. it will not change a animal from the past into a human or a monkey over millions of years. natural selection is not organized either. natural selection/survival of the fittest... wow, talk about very random...
adaptations... just change in habits, or maybe becoming tolerant to one thing or another... these processes will never change a animal of the past into a human or a monkey over millions of years... it wont change a whale to a cow, and it wont change a dog to a horse... it wont change any kind of animal to a different kind of animal no matter how much time you give...
millions of years ago.... translates to... long ago and far away... it means im about to tell you a fairytale.
3 billion years ago plants evolved photosynthesis??? if that is fact... tell me why it happened. and tell me why animals didnt evolve the same process within skin cells. tell me why its only plants.
tell me why the plants depend on birds to chirp in the morning.
tell me why plants depend on bees for cross pollination.
tell me why plate tectonic activity is a requirement for life to exist on thie earth.
tell me why the giraffe has special blood vessels in its neck to keep it from passing out or even dying whenever it bends over to drink water.
tell me why the human body doesnt have all that is included in other animals if we are so far ahead of the rest in this process of evolution.
tell me how salmon know to swim back upstream to give birth to their young.
tell me how baby turtles know where to swim after being born.
tell me how a most birds born alone know everything they need to know without being taught by a parent.
tell me how the woodpecker can open its eyes between pecks for accurate strikes.
tell my why there are symbiotic relationships in nature that have to exist in order for life processes to continue strong.
there is way too much on this earth that is unexplainable by science and will never be explained.
and indoctrinating people who dont know any better is not true science... its wrong.
Originally posted by Methuselah
the reason the giraffe has special blood vessels in its neck is because it was beneficial to have them?... wow!
uh no, its because if it didnt have those blood vessels, it would die from bending over... or it would pass out when it stood back up.
Originally posted by Methuselah
all I can do it laugh at everything you say because it all contradicts itself.
oh and I cant believe you thought that video would really get someone to believe in evolution just because people took random images and placed them in such an order to form their desired image. thats called design, not random chance.
Not dying would be a benefit, no? Or do you think being dead makes no difference to an organisms reproductive potential?
Since this was more beneficial, this trait was passed on to the giraffe's descendants. They are not evidence of intelligent design, they are evidence of evolutionary adaption.
Of course our lives aren't important in the whole scheme of things. If we all died tomorrow, you think the universe would just stop because of our deaths? We are no more important or less important than the animals around us. No one is forcing you to make others happy. It is this ignorant view that you share, that has screwed up our understanding of science. Example, geocentric model of the universe. Just because you think we as humans are the product of god and we are so special.
Originally posted by Methuselah
no more important than the animals? so if I wanted to hunt you down and kill you so I can eat, that should be ok right?
If there is no god, then there is no way of telling right from wrong.
and no, my view does not screw up any understanding of science. theories based off of flawed assumptions is what screws up science.
I already admitted that my theory is religious, now why cant you just admit yours is?
So your saying that 'god' himself can't make something without it falling? And you say there is no way of getting around it? Some of the things you say are stupid. Of course if god exist he could find a way around it. Did you just make that up on the spot to defend yourself or you know for a fact?
Originally posted by Methuselah
if God gives us freewill, the power to chose him over ourselves, than yes, no matter what we are going to fall away in one form or another.
I know that for a fact, in order to God to receive true love from us, he had to give us the freewill to chose him over ourselves. people dont understand this simply because it doesnt make sense at first. but if you take a few minutes to actually think about it, you will come to realize that its the only way for God himself to experience true love and fellowship by having faith and showing love out of choice and not because we are forced.
Originally posted by Methuselah
its good to know that people can determine when and wherein certain things evolved. you dont know and no one knows when things happened. this is all based on assumption and false dates.
I cannot believe people have you guys believing in this. and thats exactly what it is, believing.
Originally posted by Methuselah
evolution is blind, it doesnt know what is beneficial and what is not.
[edit on 27-8-2007 by Methuselah]
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Just a heads up to Conspiriology:
You may want to review this post by kinglizard, one of the moderators, about your use of all caps, or largely caps when you're angry. It's not good board etiquette.
I'm not even going to continue to discuss this point with you, as it is clear you are not (yet) capable of having an objective rational discussion without resorting to name calling and "shouting."
When you've calmed down and are willing to have a discussion without these activities, I'll be glad to carry on where we left off.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
lenisey, einstein uses words like "god" as a metaphor in much the same way one of his biggest fans, carl sagan, did.
here's a big ol quote from einstein in a letter that he wrote to an atheist.
he had no theological dispositions, no disposition to the supernatural, all of his admiration was for the natural. by his very own words he shows us he is an atheist.
If god was so great, wouldn't you think he would have better things than worry about our love?
Originally posted by Conspiriology
No he doesn't say it he suggest it. What he says you can see and hear with your own GOD DESIGNED EYES AND EARS. Just look at the PBS link
Now that quote is taken out of context and doesn't have the verbatim account as seen below
"You may call me agnostic for I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our being.
- Albert Einstein"
Ther ya have it. YOU MAY CALL ME A WHAT???
THATS RIIIGHT A G N O S T I C
Can you say that word? Go ahead try ?
C'mon,, just once try?
Yeah now that makes it clear
If I have to Ill post the VIDEO AND MPEG Sound versions also if you still don't get it after that then you are just being adversarial for the sake of argument because you feel if you can beat us at that then
Originally posted by Methuselah
wow! im glad you know everything about science and how things came about...
I think your deliberate ignorance and denial of such is far worse than what you claim to be my ignorance.
Originally posted by Methuselah
the only place I have ever seen evolution is in the textbooks. it cant even happen in the digital world.
Genetic programming (GP) is an evolutionary algorithm based methodology inspired by biological evolution to find computer programs that perform a user-defined task. Therefore it is a machine learning technique used to optimize a population of computer programs according to a fitness landscape determined by a program's ability to perform a given computational task.
...
GP is very computationally intensive and so in the 1990s it was mainly used to solve relatively simple problems. But more recently, thanks to improvements in GP technology and to the exponential growth in CPU power, GP produced many novel and outstanding results in areas such as quantum computing, electronic design, game playing, sorting, searching and many more.[4] These results include the replication or development of several post-year-2000 inventions. GP has also been applied to evolvable hardware as well as computer programs. There are several GP patents listed in the web site [5].
Originally posted by Methuselah
evolution is blind, it doesnt know what is beneficial and what is not.
Paley's argument is made with passionate sincerity and is informed by the best biological scholarship of his day, but it is wrong, gloriously and utterly wrong. The analogy between telescope and eye, between watch and living organism, is false. All appearances to the contrary, the only watchmaker in nature is the blind forces of physics, albeit deployed in a very special way. A true watchmaker has foresight: he designs his cogs and springs, and plans their interconnections, with a future purpose in his mind's eye. Natural selection, the blind, unconscious, automatic process which Darwin discovered, and which we now know is the explanation for the existence and apparently purposeful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. It has no mind and no mind's eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of watchmaker in nature, it is the blind watchmaker.
you will never be able to spell the word Zebra, Horse, Apple, Hamster,Banana or Donkey, especially with random processes.
Macro Evolution is not observable, it is assumed to have happened = Faith.
being dead in the theory of evolution is a benefit to the 'more fit'. producing offspring with the 'less fit' slows the process down. not being dead it very beneficial in my world because I get to laugh at people like you for believing in such a dumb theory that begins with "in the beginning, there was nothing..... and then all of the sudden space expanded out of nothing and matter and energy expanded space.... "
Originally posted by Methuselah
if evolution is true, there is no moral standard. just imagine, if everyone lived by the 10 commandments... life would be good.
Originally posted by Conspiriology
If god was so great, wouldn't you think he would have better things than worry about our love?
WoW this speaks VOLUMES.
Let me just suggest that GOD doesn't have to apologise for desiring the recipricol exchange of the most beautiful experience one can receive and offer.
LOVE.
Try it sometime,, fall in love or have a child, then when it is taken away from you or perhaps your child is kidnapped, dies or just runs away from home.
Tell me then if you still got better things to worry about.
Like I said before
YOU JUST DON'T
GET IT.
[edit on 28-8-2007 by Conspiriology]