It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We must only assume that the Jews referred to in the protocols do not necessarily reflect the actions or intentions of all Jews but of a small group of Zionist Jews as well as gentile oligarchs, rulers and Freemasons.
So, one can see now the true revolt against civilization. A constant subversion and perversion of the old order of things leads a path for the despotic way of the new world order.
No man, woman, or child, gentile or Jew, in support of this new world order shall remain unpunished.
Originally posted by Seekerof
billybob, respectfully....you quoted this and then made the staement/comment that you agree:
"No man, woman, or child, gentile or Jew, in support of this new world order shall remain unpunished."
I suppose those who killed 6-7 million Jews felt the same way...do you?
Never since has Israel offered to withdraw without taking the Dome of the Rock.
Originally posted by John bull 1
ďI don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian childs existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do. (Ariel Sharon, current Prime Minister, In an interview with General Ouze Merham, 1956)
Now does this sound like a Nazi ???
The man you are defending said that.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
The UN Resolution 242, that I brought forth, does not require the withdrawal of Israel from all the territories....only "territories".
No, but it states:
"Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war"
The preamble of the resolution makes it clear that aquiring territory by force in not admissible. There is no foundation for Israels claim to the land.