Micheal Moore issued a subpoena by Bush Administration?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 27-7-2007 @ 11:25 PM by AnAbsoluteCreation

Micheal Moore issued a subpoena by Bush Administration?


www.starpulse.com
Sicko director Michael Moore has been subpoenaed by the Bush administration, the filmmaker announced on The Tonight Show Thursday evening.

“I haven’t even told my own family yet,” Moore said. “I was just informed when I was back there with Jay that the Bush administration has now issued a subpoena for me.”
(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 27-7-2007 by UM_Gazz]


reply posted on 28-7-2007 @ 03:32 AM by Colloneh7
Collectivism

vs.

Individualism

Look it up. Some day you may thank me.

Forgive my edits, I'm new.

[edit on 28-7-2007 by Colloneh7]



reply posted on 28-7-2007 @ 03:49 AM by ADHDsux4me
Originally posted by RRconservative
For those of you thinking this is retribution....

In 2003 the New York Yankees settled with the US Government for $75,000 for violating the Cuba embargo.

Seems like the Yankees were smart and settled quickly. Since Moore was so blatant, and flaunting about it, the fine should be much higher.



[edit on 28-7-2007 by RRconservative]


Apples and Oranges, the Yankees are an American Icon, a symbol of national pride. They got a slap on the wrist as punishment for their semi-public voraciousness for carribean talent.

They were only ratted out because they had a bigger payroll and a near monopoly on buying the loyalty of these formally dirt-poor islanders. This is rampant all across baseball, but someone on the inside thought the yankees needed to be punished for their illegal monopoly, their "financial edge". Someone Jealous...

Moore is being targeted because he is a perennial thorn in the side to the Bush Administration. He has revealed it's complacancy to actually listen to it's constituents, and a whistleblower on the corporate take-over of our government. Our Laws are guidlines for the rich, and beauracratic draconian quagmires that drain the resources and time of the little-man.
The litte-man loses eminent domain style. He spends his money to live, not to fight inequality against a nearly limitlessly funded behemoth, with an agenda.

Don't stand in the way of Big G-dub Gubment...

For those of us that live by common sense, and see this for what it is, it's a legal dirty-fighting, sand in the eyes, retalitory maneuver.

-ADHD
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^