Originally posted by Cypher
With that said, I do have one slight concern about where this will take ATS in the future. I honestly believe that as ATS grows and begins to take in
more and more revenue that it will become harder to strike a balance between having a completely open, honest forum for ALL ideas, and making money.
How hard do you think it was to develop a 50+ page business plan focused around a free-and-open forum where there are no membership fees, no
incremental fees, and no premium fees -- then devise a long term strategy where free expression advocacy is a core ideal and "sell" that package to
various investment groups where we make it clear that the "ATS property" will have an abundance of provocative ideas on controversial subjects?
Hard? Yes. Done? Yes.
In fact, we generated a great deal of interest from established venture capital groups with legendary "dot-com" personalities to a serious
acquisition offer from a media company. In many cases, the "venture capitalists" advised we should be seeking well-into seven figures of investment
capital
and then they would be interested. But we knew our plan didn't need that much "seed money" to launch and I've been in "dot-com"
businesses since 1989... so I knew the pitfalls associated with too much start-up capital.
If and when ATS starts to bring in some seriously big revenue, (and I truly believe that they will) how long will it be before keeping that
revenue stream becomes more important than keeping to the ideals that ATS was built on?
Keep in mind that if all goes well, "The Above Network, LLC" will mean more than "ATS." I keep reminding people that ATS is a part of our plans...
a massively big and important part, but there are a significant number of unique strategies that would position the unfiltered and uncensored
intellectual content of ATS as a clear business advantage. From that position, many things can grow that may not be distinctly "ATS."
If at some point in the future, the Three Amigos have to choose between censoring an idea or losing their advertisors, and or investors, and
thus possibly the whole venture, how can one expect them to choose losing that revenue just to stick to their ideals?
Then we would be straying from our business plan and angering our investors.
Also... I've been a "VP-level" person in online advertising since 1996 (not any more

), and I'm still well-connected to the advertising
industry. As the web evolves, many advertisers are realizing that an advertisement on a website no longer fosters a strict association with the
content of the site in the same way TV or print advertising might. Just like outdoor advertising, the goal is to reach a specific kind of person, not
sponsor a specific location. The intelligent, outspoken, and socially conscious audience of ATS is an excellent audience for many advertisers... I
have no fear that we'll attract enough advertisers who "get it."