It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did you read the story... or "scan the headline"?
Originally posted by THENEO Keep blowing it Dean, keep doing a good job by doing a bad job.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by THENEO
Keep blowing it Dean, keep doing a good job by doing a bad job.
Did you read the story... or "scan the headline"?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Interesting piece in the Washington times with a somewhat helpful opinion on this topic:
www.washingtonpost.com...
Ron Faucheaux, who teaches at George Washington University's graduate school of political management, calls it "a silly game" in which journalists "create artificial benchmarks in each state."
"The media and the candidates are feeding off each other" in speculating about who needs to do what, Faucheaux says. "This second-in-this-state or third-in-that-state, that's when it really gets ridiculous."
Originally posted by THENEO
I guess I have to repost this,
Dean is doing what he is supposed to do and doing it well. I'm sure a suitable reward is being prepared for him and his supporters.
Originally posted by Bout Time
Dean is "angry"
Clarck has no "experience"
Won't deviate much from that, I'm afraid.
Originally posted by observer
I think what THENEO might be implying is that Dean might be a dupe, set up specifically because he can't get the broad based support he needs to defeat Bush.
That is about as conspiratorial as you can get, but I guess it could happen.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Although I've never even contemplated voting for Democrat in my life, I will be voting for Dean in the '04 election. Anything to rub the establishment's nose in their own shyte.