What gets me about this is that some people claim it was an inside job. Most of the claims are possibly based on the fact that some people living here
in the states hate the government because of different things. Some of the reasons that people hate the government is because of simple things. It
could be anything from the size of the government to not helping the small business. On the other hand, it could be because that people see this
administration as to being an administration that can get by with breaking the law.
Granted that this administration is testing the Constitutional Waters as to what is legal by their standards and what is legal by the Constitution.
Holding terror suspects at Gitmo for years without a trial should be defined as being in violation of Habeus Corpus, the Constitution, and maybe even
the Gevena Conventions. Granted that the actual terrorists do not go bye the Geneva Conventions nor any other documents as previously stated. To say
that if we don't find the terrorists before they strike us is an understatment. More than likely there are terrorists in this country that do want to
strike fear into the hearts of us Americans and people around the world.
To me saying that the government intentionally did this is just wrong. I agree with what was said before about an attack like that happening. It could
have happened the same exact way if Gore and Liebermann were in office in 2001. Whoever said this is dead right, "An attack can happen at any place,
any time, during any presidency." However, I don't agree that if Clinton was in office and something like this happened that people wouldn't be
bringing up the phrase "Inside Job." What blows my mind is that any person can claim that the attacks were an inside job.
The only the suspicious in my mind on 9-11 was the crash of Flight 93.
All I have to ask is that.....
Do these people even have the slightest of evidence to support the inside job claim?


and then 