It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by andyzero1234
That is exactly what I thought when I saw this: "reminds me of that seagull picture." The first thing that pops into my head when I see this picture is that this is simply a small bird swooping down past the camera.
.....I just don't understand why people feel the need to waste 14 pages on this crappy picture.
[edit on 4-8-2007 by andyzero1234]
Originally posted by RygelUK
Is the original image still on the memory card of the camera?
Would you be willing to provide that to a researcher as irrefutable proof, something that would carry much more weight than an image stored on a computer and emailed?
This, in my opinion would cut out the arguments of whether it is a modified image or not.
1) From where did you come out of the house to snap the pic?
2) Is the house in the pic your sisters house?
3) Can you provide another pic of the house, specifically your exit point just before you snapped your pic?
IF you can provide a pic of your exit point, and it's anywhere close to where you snapped your pic, then I'll eat my words. Until then, you are nothing more than a below average hoaxer. Put your money where your mouth is, I dare you.
Originally posted by knows_but_doesnt
To answer your question, I'm here, and keep coming back, because I want to flush out all the bs.
Let's try this again, and see if you can bs your way out of this.
Originally posted by yuefo
I asked about this issue of the credibility of a photo being enhanced by being able to produce the memory card. I think it was Psyop that explained images can be uploaded into the camera, so it doesn't prove much.
I always like to take the opportunity in instances like this to remind people hoping to capture images of ufos that videos are superior to stills.
Has this been forgotten by the experts or how long will it take to get the results back
Originally posted by jfj123
The photograph, although interesting, could be anything.
I myself have used a few different programs to analyze the photo and believe one of 2 things:
1. It's an overlay insert into the background.
2. A small object close to the house.
Anyway, I think at this point, the "experts" aren't impressed enough to take time and look at the photo. If at first glance the "experts" thought there was something significant, they would give it priority.
The object is technically unidentified however, EVERYONE knows when you say UFO most people are thinking ET craft not some unidentified RC hobby flyer.
Again, if the experts thought they had an actual ET craft, do you really think they would set it aside. Of course they wouldn't. It would be the most monumental discovery of our time. They wouldn't set it aside to go get a HOT POCKET. This is just logical.
If the object is flying and is not identified, then it is a UFO by definition.
Most people on this site understand the difference between a UFO and a true alien space craft (an alien craft is a UFO, but a UFO is not necessarily an alien space craft...that is logic). I don't think you even need to explain this to 99% of the people on here. It could one of ours, but if not identified, it's a UFO.
If this is truly a photo of an ET craft, would it be that monumental? There are many more out there. This wouldn't be the first. And I understand that it certainly isn't the best picture ever taken of one either.
I don't think the experts on this site asked me for what they did so they could look at it again and then blow it off. I certainly don't think they are eating Hot Pockets. I think their work deserves much more respect than th
Originally posted by jfj123
Yes, the object is technically unidentified however, EVERYONE knows when you say UFO most people are thinking ET craft not some unidentified RC hobby flyer.
Again, if the experts thought they had an actual ET craft, do you really think they would set it aside. Of course they wouldn't. It would be the most monumental discovery of our time. They wouldn't set it aside to go get a HOT POCKET. This is just logical.
Again, the term UFO gives the implication of extra terrestrial origin and you know it.
Originally posted by jfj123
Again, the term UFO gives the implication of extra terrestrial origin and you know it.