It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I have a picture of a UFO flying over my sister's house

page: 12
17
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 25 2007 @ 04:23 PM
link   
I think what alot of people are missing is the fact that it is a small object about the size of a kite. It could also be an RC plane.

This object is too small to be a manned craft of any kind.

So regardless of whether is was hovering or whatever, it is a small object of some sort, no where near the size of a B-2 or even a one man aircraft. The size is very apparent and becomes more so when you blow up the picture and increase the resolution.




posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 03:11 AM
link   
Wow. THIS thread has suddenly come to a screeching halt. I suppose we are awaiting the judgement of the Amigos' amigos.

Shush, now.







Edit: I think we need a new "shush" smiley. I'd come in handy at moments like these.


[edit on 26-7-2007 by Tuning Spork]



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 10:09 AM
link   
yeah i have been eagerly awaiting these results .. however i guess there real busy at the moment with the new 6 figure injection
i know i would be.



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 10:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by PaulWillocks


I'm thinking this may be a hoax. Did a quick bit of analysing and there are some strange pixels around the unknown craft. I may be wrong.


step 1: read entire thread
step 2: notice pixelation is around everything including the roof and trees, as pointed out by another member.


Originally posted by tyranny22

If you do the same thing to another part of the image which changes color drastically, you'll find the same thing occurs. I've posted an example below.



Though, I'm still in the category that beleives this to be a B2. I think the "abnormal" wing on the UFO is simply another blemish created by the pixelization.


[edit on 26-7-2007 by T0by]



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a few more things I have noticed.

When blown up, there is indeed pixalation around everything but there is quite a bit more defined pixilation around the object.

I blew up the photo to 7600 x 5600 at 123 megs in size. I upped t

The object is indeed small-no question.
It is approximately in line with the tree directly behind the chimney stack so it is close to the house.

There are 3 more objects just above the roofline and between the 2 trees closest to the house. These objects are set further back than the original object which would put them approximately in line with the tree to the left of the chimney stack.
What does the witness say these 3 objects are?



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 07:53 PM
link   
I blew up the photo to 7600 x 5600 at 123 megs in size. I upped t

GIGO!



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 08:41 PM
link   
nice thread


i "shopped" around a little,so to say, and came up with this:

www.bananajunctiontoys.com...

maybe some kid down the street was playing around with this kind of thing...

that still doesent account for it dissapearing in the blink of an eye



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 09:34 PM
link   
I'm wondering why the OP didn't just take one step out the patio door and click the picture? Instead we have a whole house photo. Is the front door/other door to the left of this picture?

I for one would like more pictures of the house, not the UFO, to decide if this is BS or not. When you're in a hurry to snap an "out of this world object", I can't see anyone walking out on the lawn more than a step or two enough to snap a photo(s)! Key word... "photos" ;-)

Just my observation. How about it OP, could we get a picture of the house from where you were standing when you took your photo? I'd like to see if there is a door there.



posted on Jul, 27 2007 @ 01:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
a few more things I have noticed.

There are 3 more objects just above the roofline and between the 2 trees closest to the house. These objects are set further back than the original object which would put them approximately in line with the tree to the left of the chimney stack.
What does the witness say these 3 objects are?


These objects could be tv aerials or more "Kites"








posted on Jul, 27 2007 @ 03:19 PM
link   
You are talking about yourselves.
The object was already trying to be photographed with a cell phone which was not giving good enough picture. The other camera was being looked for inside the house, and when it was found was brought out to the person where he was at, already trying to take a picture of the object.

Now, anyone can claim fouls but unless you carry your camera with you all the time and it is ready and fully charged, then I suggest that as people posting you have not proved that you are doing that.

And just to add, I am not doing that although I could. Because of circumstances of where I live, I find it highly unlikely that I will ever see a UFO anyway. They end up being somewhere else all the time which makes me think that since they are usually near large city areas that most of the time it does turn out to be something else, kids playing or something which is allowed. So make sure your spacealien kid is not up to doing something when you think you have seen an UFO. They are just kids anyway, corny or not.



posted on Jul, 27 2007 @ 04:04 PM
link   


There are 3 more objects just above the roofline and between the 2 trees closest to the house. These objects are set further back than the original object which would put them approximately in line with the tree to the left of the chimney stack.
What does the witness say these 3 objects are?



I never noticed them until now (good eye). Don't know what they are. It will have to wait until I'm at my sister's again. She lives about an hour and a half from my home in Massachusetts and obviously, quite far from my home in Arizona.




Just my observation. How about it OP, could we get a picture of the house from where you were standing when you took your photo? I'd like to see if there is a door there.



A picture from the same place, would show the same thing wouldn't it? If you are asking if there is a door where the deck is, the answer is yes. I don't need to take a picture of the sliding glass door.



I'm wondering why the OP didn't just take one step out the patio door and click the picture? Instead we have a whole house photo. Is the front door/other door to the left of this picture?

I for one would like more pictures of the house, not the UFO, to decide if this is BS or not. When you're in a hurry to snap an "out of this world object", I can't see anyone walking out on the lawn more than a step or two enough to snap a photo(s)! Key word... "photos" ;-)


I took the picture from where I was standing because that's where I was when I first saw the object. I didn't want to move and didn't even think of moving. Did you read the whole thread? I tried to take pictures with my cell phone and they were garbage. That's when my sister went into the house to find her camera. I didn't move from where I was standing. She brought the camera to me.

What will more pictures of the house prove? Seriously....how will more pictures of the house help you? I can assure you this isn't BS. I can assure you that that photograph is legitimate. The owners of this site are reviewing it with their experts. I have been in communication with them and they are very busy with other things and will get back to us all as soon as they are able.

People always complain that many photos of UFOs are taken with no point of reference. Just a picture of the object in the sky by itself. Pretty hard to tell what something is if there is nothing around it. I made sure the house was in the picture as a reference point. I guess I had time to think about it as it took my sister quite a while to find her camera. I wish I had known it had a video feature and how to use it. That's what I would have done if I was at all familiar with the camera (used the video feature).

Many also complain that many UFO pictures are taken at night as well. Also hard to tell what you've got when it's just lights in the darkness. I am able to get a clear shot of the object during the day with a good point of reference and to some, that somehow seems fishy.

The picture is real. The only questions is, what is it of? That's the answer we are waiting for.

[edit on 27-7-2007 by Excitable_Boy]



posted on Jul, 27 2007 @ 08:23 PM
link   
Kudo's for sticking with your story and your patience, I would have snapped by now. Perhaps you should re-name yourself "Mellowboy"



posted on Jul, 27 2007 @ 10:06 PM
link   
How can you say that Zabilgy is garbage in Armenian? Have you somehow mastered this difficult language? I don't see how you can just give an armenian word english letters. The language is complex, and made up of some characters of which we have no english equivalent.

I say your story is TOTAL BS man.



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 11:11 AM
link   


How can you say that Zabilgy is garbage in Armenian? Have you somehow mastered this difficult language? I don't see how you can just give an armenian word english letters. The language is complex, and made up of some characters of which we have no english equivalent.

I say your story is TOTAL BS man.



WOW! This is how you have debunked my photograph and the story behind it?

Have you ever heard of Phonetics? It's spelling something in our language based on the sound. It's spelling it PHONETICALLY!

As I stated earlier in this thread, my first wife was Armenian. Her family was quite large and they all spoke Armenian more than they did English. I guess I was able to pick up a few words.

If you want a lesson in Phonetics, go here: www.armeniapedia.org...


- ts'tesutyun


[edit on 28-7-2007 by Excitable_Boy]



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by jakeolsen2219
How can you say that Zabilgy is garbage in Armenian? Have you somehow mastered this difficult language? I don't see how you can just give an armenian word english letters. The language is complex, and made up of some characters of which we have no english equivalent.

I say your story is TOTAL BS man.


Ah, to be young and trolling.

Seriously, that is the lamest post I have read in a while. I am Native American, and because we lack a formal written language, it must be spelled phonetically all the time.

And would it be so hard for those that want to call his thread "zabilgy" to wait for the experts to at least have a say about the photos?



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Evasius
Maybe this craft would look a bit like the object in the photo (at a distance):



However there's obviously sound and motion associated with the object in the video.

Maybe the object in the photograph was on a long, slow gliding approach which would explain its hovering. Once it was closer and banked either left or right it would just seem to fly off from a stationary position. Or it was a kite and the string snapped in a gust of wind (was it windy on the day the pic was taken)?

Also, does anyone know what the object is in the above video?

i dont know what it is but i started a thread on it if you find any thing on it please post there.my thread
thanks. miguel



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 08:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by NGC2736

Originally posted by jakeolsen2219
How can you say that Zabilgy is garbage in Armenian? Have you somehow mastered this difficult language? I don't see how you can just give an armenian word english letters. The language is complex, and made up of some characters of which we have no english equivalent.

I say your story is TOTAL BS man.


Ah, to be young and trolling.

Seriously, that is the lamest post I have read in a while. I am Native American, and because we lack a formal written language, it must be spelled phonetically all the time.

And would it be so hard for those that want to call his thread "zabilgy" to wait for the experts to at least have a say about the photos?


Oh to be slow and gullable.

Lookup the REAL word for garbage in aremenian, and then you can come back here and say you're sorry. I actually took the time to look it up before making that post. I am not one to just jump to conclusions without anything to back it up. If you are too blind to see that this guy is just spewing BS, then there's nothing more to say to you really.

I'm sorry that I find it questionable that his wife spoke armenian and he picked it up. Most Armenians don't even speak armenian anymore, they speak a mixture armenian, russian, or farsi. But armenians living in America? I just have a hard time seeing a bunch of them walking around saying Zabilgy all the time. Give me a break people.

[edit on 28-7-2007 by jakeolsen2219]



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 08:57 PM
link   
It looks to me like a kite also.

Here is a link with some of the kites I thought of immediately when I saw it.

coda.co.za...

It looks like someone in the next yard over is flying it.

[quote]Originally posted by section8citizen
I can see several possibilities. Military aircraft is possible, but also (as silly as this sounds) it has the general shape of a large kite.

OP- is there any way you can run the pic through paint shop pro or any other program and blow it up a little?



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 09:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptAvatar
OP- is there any way you can run the pic through paint shop pro or any other program and blow it up a little?


Seriously man, no disrespect intended, but, read the thread before you post something that has already been discussed several times. "Paint shop pro" your kidding right?


[edit on 28-7-2007 by IMAdamnALIEN]



posted on Jul, 28 2007 @ 10:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by jakeolsen2219

Oh to be slow and gullable.


jakeolsen2219, You were accusing the OP of being guileful, and now me of gullibility.Your attitude smells of gurry mixed with guano.

To nit pick over where a word in someone's vocabulary comes from is not damning evidence in the eyes of most people. And your mastery of the English rules of spelling are so unimpressive that I give little weight to you as an authority on matters of language skills.

I simply pointed out that prior to hoisting the OP on his own petard, we ought wait for the photo analysis, which is a critical piece of evidence, as opposed to semantics.

But even so, my apologies if you feel injured for my pointing these things. And have a nice day.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join