It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Define "speedy trial".
Speedy Trial
You have a right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which requires that trials be held within a certain time frame after a person has been charged with a crime.
This right can be waived by asking for additional time for the preparation of your defense.
Speedy Trial rights in Maryland
In Maryland, you have the right to have your trial date set for no later than 180 days from the date of your appearance before the court. The trial date may be changed if good cause is shown.
If it is the fact that he was incarcerated that bothers you, then give him the opportunity to make bail.
Some people click their tongues to communicate. How are we supposed to support that?
Originally posted by adnachiel21
ok maybe im too radical,but i think that pedofills dont deserve trial,if there is obvious evidence they should be send to the chair,maybe not necessaraly gas chamber would do also,because they are never cured,they gonna molest another child,so call it a public service
Originally posted by adnachiel21
ok maybe im too radical,but i think that pedofills dont deserve trial,if there is obvious evidence they should be send to the chair,maybe not necessaraly gas chamber would do also,because they are never cured,they gonna molest another child,so call it a public service
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
intrepid, which councel are you referring to? Defense or prosecution?
Originally posted by jsobecky
Btw, the prosecution had found 3 previous translators for this guy:
The first one couldn't tolerate the gory details
The second one was chronically late
The third one had work issues that interfered.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
OK,
well as Jso pointed out, that wasn't the case. Each translator had their own reasons for not taking part in the case. If we're going to be mad at someone, maybe it should be them.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Btw, the prosecution had found 3 previous translators for this guy:
The first one couldn't tolerate the gory details
The second one was chronically late
The third one had work issues that interfered.
The first interpreter stormed out of the courtroom in tears because she found the facts of the case disturbing. A second interpreter was rejected for faulty work. A third Vai interpreter was located, but at the last minute, that person had to tend to a family emergency.
A court-appointed psychiatrist recommended that an interpreter be appointed and judges who handled subsequent hearings heeded that advice.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
A court-appointed psychiatrist recommended that an interpreter be appointed and judges who handled subsequent hearings heeded that advice.
So it was the court who determined the need for the interpreter.
Police arrested Kanneh, of Gaithersburg, in August 2004 after witnesses told police he assaulted the girl multiple times. He spent one night in jail and was released on a $10,000 bond with the restriction that he have no contact with minors.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
The thing about appeals is that they have to prove that the judge did something illegal. If she was legally allowed to do this, then he's still scott free.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
No, that is not true. Appeals courts always have full ability to override judges' ruling on findings of law in such of a procedural matter.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
How so? It was my understanding that in order to make it to the appeals court the person seeking the appeal has to prove that there is grounds for appeal in the first place.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Yeah, one night in jail isn't much at all, but he still has the right to a speedy trial, and if the courts can't give him that, then they've failed in their duty.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Besides he should have been held until an interpreter could have been found.
Does that mean indefinitely? The case was pending for 3 years, and they couldn't find an interpreter in that time. 3 years is certainly not a speedy trial, which is one of the rights granted us in the constitution.
If we held him until an interpreter could be found that would open a can of worms that I don't think we want opened. It means that we could hold anyone who doesn't speak English fluently until the state finds someone who speaks their native language. This could lead to massive abuse of the system.
Originally posted by zysin5
Just to add real quick here guys.. They where going to lock me up for no less than 5 years in prison for not paying my taxes!!!
Yet people can rape and hurt a child and spend 1 day in jail.