So what's going on at Groom Lake?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 22-7-2007 @ 09:48 AM by thebozeian
Like many here in this forum I don't buy easily into conspiracy theories. I prefer to deal in cold hard facts or reasonable probabillities. But when someone builds a 600ft long hanger in the middle of a dry lake bed at an airbase that isn't acknowledged and doesn't want you to even photograph it from 10 miles away, my ears prick up.

Take a look
here, click on the "new building" link and view for yourself.

So I guess the question is what are they doing? Could it be a "Lockheed SR-72"? Obviously no one here knows (or if they do they are not about to tell) but after seeing that photo provided by intelgurl looking from Creech AFB towards Groom Lake, I thought it might be interesting for us to speculate. Over to you all.

LEE.


reply posted on 24-7-2007 @ 08:15 AM by Canada_EH
Originally posted by intelgurl

Having done work at Tonopah, I know how compartmentalized some projects can be and how the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing (metaphorically speaking).

Considering that projects at Groom Lake are spooky black, and even more compartmentalized, I would venture a guess and say that whatever is housed in that large hangar is one project, not a potpourri of projects.


Hey Intelgurl its great to have you back posting! I'm actually just returning myself after getting hitched on the 14th and going to Cuba for a honeymoon. Married life just as crazy as before. Hope to see you around for a bit how long is your leave? Anyways back to the subject eh.

The above quote from your post goes in the face of a possible F-19 myth that Mr John Lear has been touting as a answer to the designation. Personally I think the F-19/F-20 Tigershark explination is good enough but hey who knows 100% for sure anymore. The point is that Lear claims that the F-117 and the F-19 where built in the same building. He also claims the 2 planes had major difference. For me this is harder to believe espesially when as you said these projects even though compartmentalized are still seperated to not allow problems that Mr Lear claimed happen.

As to my take more so on tha addition I think its neat that we can follow it with its progress but I doubt we will get a good idea what its intended for unless the Gov makes a mistake about whats sitting out for the sat's equipment to pick out.


reply posted on 25-7-2007 @ 12:08 AM by intelgurl
Originally posted by Canada_EH
The above quote from your post goes in the face of a possible F-19 myth that Mr John Lear has been touting as a answer to the designation. Personally I think the F-19/F-20 Tigershark explination is good enough but hey who knows 100% for sure anymore. The point is that Lear claims that the F-117 and the F-19 where built in the same building. He also claims the 2 planes had major difference. For me this is harder to believe espesially when as you said these projects even though compartmentalized are still seperated to not allow problems that Mr Lear claimed happen.

I would not presume to know better than John Lear concerning the F-117 and the F-19. That was 25+ years ago and I was still playing with dolls back then. All I can attest to is the level of security used now at Tonopah, and assume that project security at Groom is far more strict and compartmentalized than that.

Originally posted by thebozeian
Hmm Global Strike (or interim bomber?) that is a reasonably logical suggestion. I do wonder however why a white world project would be out at Groom Lake? Not saying it isn't feasible, just that they normally wouldn't be to keen to raise a high profile on a project out there and all the possible scrutiny from nosey congressmen and press that it brings. Then again it is a nice quiet place to work on a strategically important project. Maybe the government is getting concerned about spying activity on such development work by the Chinese and others?

"White world project"?
No.
The next gen bomber project will be/is deep black. Air Combat Command chief General Ronald Keys has been quoted as saying, “I think that it will probably start out just like a number of our high-end technical programs -- it is going to start as a ‘black' program until we understand where we are going...”
He goes on to say, “The details of what it is going to look like, how fast it is going to go, how far it is going to go, what it's real capabilities are and stuff like that, I am not sure we are interested in letting a lot of people know what those will be.”

No, the next gen bomber/global strike will have to be developed at a site such as Groom; Groom is remote with tight security and they have a 10 + mile runway - sounds perfect to me.

Source:
New Bomber Program to Begin 'Black': InsideDefense.com



[edit on 7-25-2007 by intelgurl]


reply posted on 26-7-2007 @ 01:32 AM by intelgurl
Originally posted by thebozeian
intelgurl,
when I say it wont be a black project I mean it wont be in the same class as say the F-117 development, which as you know was totally denied by the government untill it was declassified and brought out into the light. There is nothing too black about the interim bomber, given that we know about it, the project is discussed freely in the press and it is an officially announced DoD project. It may not be a full white world program but then it isnt really overly black either, more a shade of grey, much like the F-22 and to a degree the F-35 are.
...

Having said that I believe that we agree that it is logical to run such a strategically important project out of somewhere like Groom Lake. In the end our only difference of opinion it seems is where black, white and grey lie.

When I refer to "black" I am generally referring to a Special Access Program. Some such programs can be acknowledged but any and all details cannot be transferred to the public sector.

For instance the technology behind midcourse missile defense is a black program (SAP). We know they are doing something but what that something is, nobody on the outside knows.

While you have really good points, most of which I agree with, I think what we tend to disagree on is the terminology.

There is yet another possibiity of what the new hangar at Groom is for, and that is a Northrop Grumman - Scaled Composites spaceplane. I'll guarantee you one is in the works.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 15 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 124 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 13 hours ago, 104 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 67 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies