It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
One of he many things you should be learning from Don's life experience is that there is more than one way to govern.
we find ourselves in a postion wherein compromise is not possible. Under these conditions, it all comes down to p-p-politics and party goals.
posted by xpert11 -I understand that different people bring different levels of influence and leadership to the White House. I think that the president should be the main player off there branch of government (forgive me I can’t come up with a better description then that). Any political system designed around representing the people requires an inbuilt mechanism that ensure fair representation or check sum and balances.
posted by Julian Oldham -The resignation of Alberto Gonzales would seem to be the news item of the day. There can be no doubt that this will be another 'stain' for the Republican candidates to wipe off. I find myself thinking this is one more chance for the GOP field to change its tune and push for the reforms they know the voters want. Update: it's being reported that Homeland Security boss Michael Chertoff could be the Bush pick to replace Gonzales.
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
The resignation of Alberto Gonzales would seem to be the news item of the day. There can be no doubt that this will be another 'stain' for the Republican canddiates to try and wipe off.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Hey I was wondering do you see the actions of Gonzales as just normal actions like other Attorney Generals in other administrations both Rep and Dem? Or do you think the uproar from the Dems was not just a good political ploy?
posted by Justin Oldham
The 'average' Attorney General doesn't find himself in the hotseat like this. It's true that the Democrats are playing hard ball politics just now . . That's why you're not going to see anything more that lip service from the Dems as regards contempt charges. All of the naughty new precedents that Bush has established will be there for the using in 2009. Not even THEY will be able to resist that temptation.
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
boots on the ground, per se ... (?)
Obama, seems to be the democratic equivalent of Ron Paul ... funded mostly by individual/singular donations.
Money can't buy you love, and this time around I don't think it'll buy you an election either ... change is in the wind, hopefully ...
posted by Justin Oldham
When Bush talked about a longer-term relationship with Iraq, I distinctly heard another nail go in to the GOP coffin. I also heard a 'click' that confirmed my suspicions about future GOP strategy. it boils down to one thing. The RNC (the great minds that staff the Republican National Committee) have decided that its better for that "Saigon Moment" to occur on Hillary's watch.
The old men in charge of the GOP have a phobia when it comes to anything that looks or smells like Vietnam. They don't want to be anywhere near it. I made my prediction in this thread over one year ago. When Hillary brings the troops home, that one single act will guarantee Democrat primacy for four more years.