It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
Wow, where does one even begin with the Christian bash fest here? I think I see how the game is played. One person finds the most extreme example of someone who calls himself a Christian to start a post and then everyone else piles on. Fun!
Now, let's wade our way through some of the muck here...
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
LOL. Now, it's REALLY getting deep. I hate to break this to you, but it's called "The Universal LAW of Gravity", NOT the "theory of gravity". Again, gravity is testable and has been tested for thousands of years. And the TESTABLE evidence that backs up evolution is???
Originally posted by grimreaper797
MOD EDIT: STOP QUOTING YOURSELF AND STOP QUOTING ENTIRE POSTS
Now imagine how all the moderate muslims feel? How many times have you stuck up for them when the bash fest was on them? ... Then remember, you ain't special, and they do it with every group they can.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
Uh, actually, the media bends over backwards for Muslims, because it would be "politically incorrect" to do otherwise. Also, you are comparing apples and oranges. Are there moderate Muslims who oppose terrorism? Absolutely. I wish they would be more vocal in denouncing terrorism. Still, a significant wing of Islam is bent on wiping out all "infidels" at the point of a sword. MILLIONS if not BILLIONS of Muslims support the extremists. Now then, name me a dozen Christians that are in favor of killing professors.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
MOD EDIT: PLEASE STOP QUOTING YOURSELF
you just lost all crediblity right there. Einsteins THEORY of relativity.... come on man. if you are going to talk about science, at least know the basics.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
MOD EDIT: PLEASE STOP QUOTING YOURSELF AND STOP QUOTING ENTIRE POSTS
Ok, so what evidence is this backed on again? ... just like muslism, have no problem killing in the name of their religion.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
MOD EDIT: REMOVED LARGE NESTED QUOTE
Huh? I'm the one trying to explain the basics here. Funny how I have to drag the evolutionists along kicking and screaming. Yes, Einstein's theory is just that. A theory. If it were a law, it would be called "Einstein's LAW of relativity". It's a theory, not a law. So what's the problem?
But since you brought it up, let's talk about why "evolution" is called a "theory", and not a law. Where is this objective evolution information? What is the scientific method, and does evolution follow it? Basically, the scientific method involves making observations, then predictions, and then experiments to prove or disprove a hypothesis.
Scientists use observations, hypotheses and deductions to propose explanations for natural phenomena in the form of "theories". Predictions from these theories are tested by experiment. If a prediction turns out to be correct, the theory survives.
Now, WHERE can the theory of evolution be tested with objective information? Evolution, like all science, is built from a foundation by various ideas. If that base is wrong, the rest of the theory doesn’t matter. At the base of evolution are several main principles.
1. Matter comes from nothing.
2. Non-living material can spontaneously become alive.
3. Species can change from one to another.
4. Explosions produce order.
According to the scientific method, we should have repeatable experiments to prove such things are true.
WHERE IS IT?
I'm sorry, but if you have no repeatable experiments for these ideas, they’re not science. Interesting ideas perhaps, but not science. Debatable? Sure. But not science.
So why do scientists abandon their own method? Perhaps because some desire to explain away God they grasp for anything no matter how ridiculous.
That's my "theory" anyway.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
I have read that religious scholars put the number at 20% for the number of Muslims that are of the "extreme" variety.
That would be a mere 200 million if true. Is this accurate? Nobody knows for sure, so your "guarantee" is hollow and meaningless. How in the world could you "guarantee" such a thing? At least you are willing to admit that it's in the millions.
Now, then, your thinking that there are as many "extreme Christians" is based upon what again?
When did these "Christian extremists" fly airplanes into buildings? Blow up their children in crowded malls?
Again, I'm asking for the names of TWELVE so-called Christians who advocate such activities.
Still waiting...
I could go on and on through time of the countless leaders in christianity who proclaimed crusades and advocaded the deaths of non christian people around the world. My point is, just because they don't have a leader actively calling for crusades, doesn't mean they won't act when one does. Muslim extremists, for a great deal, only act because they have leaders to follow right now. People in general will take steps such as murder only when a leader calls for them to do so.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
wow...do you know ANYTHING about this topic at ALL?
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Ok lets start with the basics. We have genetics. Genetics deals with Genes. Genes determine what we are. The hair we have, color eyes, length of our necks. Now you have mutations. Mutations can occur for various reasons. Mutations, which are observable in nature, can be recessive genes. These genes sometimes become the dominate gene, and that animal/person displays that gene. Somewhere along the lines, giraffes had offspring with longer necks, because of genetic mutation. This mutation was beneficial, and allowed the giraffe to have an advantage over other animals of its species. Because of this, it lived longer to produce. Over LONG periods of time, the recessive gene becomes more dominate because the animals with the gene are more prone to produce the same genetic make up in its offspring.
They didn't just one day change. It took many many years. It took time for the long neck gene to replace the others. Sometimes, it doesnt take as long, in instance where the food supply may run out for the shorter necked animals, where the longer neck animals could still reach food. These circumstances are how new speicies are born.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
In other words, you can't name even 12 current "Christian extremists" to compare to current Muslim extremists, while at the same time admitting that there are indeed "millions" of Muslim extremists. And you wonder why comparing the two is apples and oranges?
But you just know that "Christian extremists" are millions of ticking timebombs, just waiting for a leader to come along and give them their killing orders which they will dutifully carry out because, well, you just know. And, hey, they have a history of doing some killing, so history will simply repeat itself, right?
Okay, using that logic, I guess the millions of people who don't like Christians are also "ticking timebombs, just waiting for a leader to come along and give them their killing orders which they will dutifully carry out." I mean, Christians have been hunted down, enslaved, tortured, fed to the lions, killed, etc. for 2000+ years now.
So, why aren't you warning us all about the dangers of "anti-Christian extremism"???
Hmmm???
Originally posted by grimreaper797
findarticles.com...
something that is also a proposed theory. It is a theory because it is an idea, backed with logic, that makes a connection with two events that have occured in nature causing this theory. This theory is a theory because necking is witnessed in nature. It's a known event amoung these animals to engage in this practice to win a mate.
www.scq.ubc.ca...
Many researchers now suggest that the primary function of giraffe neck length is not for reaching leaves on tall trees, but for male combat (“necking”), or for spotting predators, or for shedding heat through increased skin surface area. All of these functions “have been viewed by prominent scientists as a chief reason for the evolution of the long necks” (Gould 56f.). Darwin himself (202) alludes to some of these as alternate possibilities.