It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Djarums
I personally would still like to know why the treasury secretary was being handed all of these memos marked "secret" regarding foreign policy. The cabinet is a fairly large group, do you think each of them gets all the "secret" memos that aren't relevant to their positions?
Originally posted by Seapeople
Have a quick look at this:
"1998 Iraqi Liberation Act"
news.findlaw.com...
Read through it, take it in........ Then remind me what we were discussing in this thread again.
Maybe bite into this one a little, and see how it tastes:
www.cnn.com...
[Edited on 1/12/2004 by Seapeople]
Originally posted by Seapeople
Have a quick look at this:
"1998 Iraqi Liberation Act"
news.findlaw.com...
Read through it, take it in........ Then remind me what we were discussing in this thread again.
Maybe bite into this one a little, and see how it tastes:
www.cnn.com...
[Edited on 1/12/2004 by Seapeople]
Originally posted by Seekerof
Originally posted by Seapeople
Have a quick look at this:
"1998 Iraqi Liberation Act"
news.findlaw.com...
Read through it, take it in........ Then remind me what we were discussing in this thread again.
Maybe bite into this one a little, and see how it tastes:
www.cnn.com...
[Edited on 1/12/2004 by Seapeople]
Seapeople,
You may wish or want to read my comments and those of others on what you posted in this ATSNN thread:
"NEWS: Iraq Invasion Planned Before 9/11"
Link:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
regards
seekerof
Originally posted by Seapeople
Oh, I see. Basically what you are saying is that it is ok for a democrat to engage in military action. It is OK for a democrat to actually pass a law that requires the United States to install a democratic government in Iraq. (conveniently near the end of his term in office) It is not OK for a conservative politician to do the same though. Thanks for clearing that up.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
somehow, I feel this will be old news soon, Paul O'Niell will be investigated, his credibility will be shot down and Bush will remain on top.
Is there any way to ensure that the media and Congress actually follow up on this issue.
Originally posted by Seapeople
Posted originally by rant:
"Thank you for clearing that up. You like being lied to."
Another quote comes to mind when I hear that.
"I did not have sexual relations with that women"
Now as I recall, back then, a presidents character had no bearing on his leadership skills. I am not defending Georgy. I am attacking the liberal double standards. Liberals follow there masters like sheep. Campaign on the issues. Never solve them. Instigate racism to gain political power. Then make claims of racism from elsewhere. (just one example) Never questioning. Never understanding.
Originally posted by Seapeople
It was predictable for one reason. I am right. No use denying the truth.
Originally posted by Seekerof
BT....
"Scott Ritter sure has been fully vetted, huh? I mean, there were a ton of allegations out of the woodwork when he called it straight."
"Called it straight".....when was that BT....just after his 1998 departure from UNSCOM and his reports to them and the US or after he received his $400,000 and then he changes his tune? You may think nothing of it BT, but its called lacking credibility. What, he and others wake up in the morning and flip a coin to figure on what 'story' they going to tell today or next year?
Yeah....Ritter definitely "called it straight".....wow.
regards
seekerof
[Edited on 12-1-2004 by Seekerof]