It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flight 93 Hypothetical

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 16 2007 @ 06:04 PM
link   
Ok, let's say the whole ordeal was planned and implemented by the government. I don't have any evidence to support this, and if it's been brought up before, then my apologies.

My theory is this. How about Flight 93 as part of the plan was intended to0 go down where it did, solely for the reason that the government could "claim" that it was heading for the White House?

I zipped through a couple threads, and while I found alot of mention, I couldn't find this as a reason.

Let's think about it. GWB was in a school on the morning of 9/11. I can't remember offhand where Cheney was, but I doubt he was at the White House. That leaves nobody of major importance there. I state major only as the P and VP, I know that all lives are important. But it seems to me that on the morning of 9/11, anybody who might have a possible role in those events, was not in a place where they could have been hit.

Even Rumsfeld, while he was at the Pentagon, was on the other side of it. I also think that after watching the video of Bush upon hearing of the attacks from the schoolroom, had a smirk on his face. Almost like he was trying to hide it, knowing that it had already happened.

Back on topic though. I'm really starting to think that Flight 93 was destined to disappear on a trajectory to an important place. This gives the opportunity to not only claim it was headed for the White House, but also the chance to make heroes, as we've seen.

Any thoughts?




posted on Jul, 16 2007 @ 10:05 PM
link   
If it was meant to go down heading towards a important place, I think if the plane actually hit the white house it would of had more impact. I mean come on, they would of hit the white house! There is no better reason to retaliate than that the terrorists destroyed the white house. And yes there was no one of major importance in there, and even if there was they would of probably been evacuated by now. I honestly believe that fl9 was shot down, but I have yet to find a reason, yes it created a hero aspect but I think the impact would of hit the united states more if they had let the plane hit the white house, but then again we are not 100% sure it was going to hit the white house.



posted on Jul, 16 2007 @ 11:54 PM
link   
Actually, Cheney was in the White House. 93 was shot down and that is the cover up if any that deals with 9/11. Look into it, there were 6 people in total who would know the truth about it being bought down. Nice alternative theory though.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 01:52 PM
link   
Cheney was more than likely safe from any attack, and by looking at the fl93 crash photos cheney could of dug a hole under the white house and been safe.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Ok, so it was shot down, and Cheney was in the White House. That's not what I'm getting at though. What if F93 was never intended to hit any target? What if it was only supposed to look like it, so that 1. there's a reason to shoot it down (even if it's covered up), 2. to say that it was headed for the white house, and something needed to be done about it, and 3. again, the hero point



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 03:09 PM
link   
The Government would not want to tell about the shooting down of a passenger plane. Then all terrorists have to do is hijack a couple of planes and crash one and fly the others toward 'other' important destinations. Then the air force would end up doing the terrorists jobs. Also the flight industry would lose a substantial amount of flyers (with the thought of possibly being shot down by one's own Government).

Flt93 was shot down.......but it will be handled in the 'JFK style' of release, in 40-50 years from now.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mekanic
Ok, so it was shot down, and Cheney was in the White House. That's not what I'm getting at though. What if F93 was never intended to hit any target? What if it was only supposed to look like it, so that 1. there's a reason to shoot it down (even if it's covered up), 2. to say that it was headed for the white house, and something needed to be done about it, and 3. again, the hero point


Well if the plane's intention was innocent, it would continue its way to California, not heading towards D.C.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 03:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mekanic
Ok, so it was shot down, and Cheney was in the White House. That's not what I'm getting at though. What if F93 was never intended to hit any target? What if it was only supposed to look like it, so that 1. there's a reason to shoot it down (even if it's covered up), 2. to say that it was headed for the white house, and something needed to be done about it, and 3. again, the hero point


It was intended to hit the White House (testimony backs this up) . There is no reason to add a contingency that is not useful and could backfire if not handled properly such as a plane crash.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 03:36 PM
link   
Can you point me to the testimony? Because all I have right now to go on is the government who claims it was a terrorist act and that the terrorists died in the crash.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 04:29 PM
link   
cheney went to the presidential bunker after it was realized that the us was under attack...per the official story....(the presidential bunker is a bunker beneath the white house that supposedly can withstand a nuclear bomb blowing up right above it)....

and i spent so long away from the computer i forgot what else i was going to type...*intelligent quip* I'M OUT!!



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 07:12 PM
link   
But what I am trying to get through is if they just let it hit the white house the level of fear would of been greater than what happened, and they would of had to of not covered so much up. But saying that there is not 100% (is there?) that the plane was heading towards the white house I heard it might of been heading towards the sears tower.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 07:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by racerzeke
But what I am trying to get through is if they just let it hit the white house the level of fear would of been greater than what happened, and they would of had to of not covered so much up. But saying that there is not 100% (is there?) that the plane was heading towards the white house I heard it might of been heading towards the sears tower.


Lets think about it this way, maybe the white house was a target and it was on its way. We had people who managed to knock out the terrorists and take over the plane. The Government knows that the people on board successfully took back the plane and are going to try and land it at a near by airport. So what does the government do? They shoot it down and claim that the people on board tried to take over the plane but failed thus becoming instant hero's.

Government can still go with there official plan in saying the plane was intended for the White House still having a dramatic effect on people.

We know Osama Bin Laden was a CIA Asset. Is it possible that that the CIA and evil elements within the Government used Osama to attain 19 hijackers who hate the west. The only person that would need to know about the Government involvement would be Osama. All the terrorist need to know is they are going to hijack 4 planes, its called a Need to know basis. The hijackers dont need to know that the government is overlooking the whole operation. Osama presents his plan to the hijackers that are willing to die and the hijackers agree. Thus the operation going to plan.

It's probably the only explanation i have to the reason why we still can not find Osama Bin Laden.

Just my own theory.

Either way the 9/11 official explanation does not make sense at all.

BeZerKJ



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by BeZerk

Lets think about it this way, maybe the white house was a target and it was on its way. We had people who managed to knock out the terrorists and take over the plane. The Government knows that the people on board successfully took back the plane and are going to try and land it at a near by airport. So what does the government do? They shoot it down and claim that the people on board tried to take over the plane but failed thus becoming instant hero's.


do you even know the level of herodom they would have attained had they been able to take it over and fly it back to an airport?....then CT'ers would say that was more proof this was a conspiracy..."no average joe can fly an airplane!!"



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 08:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by wenfieldsecret

Originally posted by BeZerk

Lets think about it this way, maybe the white house was a target and it was on its way. We had people who managed to knock out the terrorists and take over the plane. The Government knows that the people on board successfully took back the plane and are going to try and land it at a near by airport. So what does the government do? They shoot it down and claim that the people on board tried to take over the plane but failed thus becoming instant hero's.


do you even know the level of herodom they would have attained had they been able to take it over and fly it back to an airport?....then CT'ers would say that was more proof this was a conspiracy..."no average joe can fly an airplane!!"


No, do we even know that the pilots were killed?

BeZerK



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 08:34 PM
link   
I thought I read somewhere about ex-pilots being on fl93, I will look but couldnt he(them) of flown the plane? But I guess the heroes never got full control of the plane because the terrorists dove it into the ground so says the government.



posted on Jul, 17 2007 @ 10:31 PM
link   
I believe the pilot among the passengers was Donald Peterson, a retired
owner of company which made equipment for aviation industry. He
had a private pilot license with multi engine rating. More than enough to
handle the plane (with some help)



posted on Jul, 18 2007 @ 01:08 PM
link   
we know nothing of the shape of the pilots.....alls we know is when it was supposed to have been hijacked....

www.apfn.net...

The hijackers attacked at 9:28. While traveling 35,000 feet above eastern Ohio, United 93 suddenly dropped 700 feet. Eleven seconds into the descent, the FAA’s air traffic control center in Cleveland received the first of two radio transmissions from the aircraft....


but also how would it be shot down?....one of the ct'ers favorite things to use is the "fact" that there were only 14 available aircraft to protect the entire US.....two of which took off and went over the atlantic....



posted on Jul, 18 2007 @ 09:33 PM
link   
But what type of planes are we talking about? I'm assuming f-16s and stuff like that right? There hast to be more than a couple of those, and let alone a-10s which is what several witnesses say they saw around fl93.



posted on Jul, 18 2007 @ 09:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71

Originally posted by Mekanic
Ok, so it was shot down, and Cheney was in the White House. That's not what I'm getting at though. What if F93 was never intended to hit any target? What if it was only supposed to look like it, so that 1. there's a reason to shoot it down (even if it's covered up), 2. to say that it was headed for the white house, and something needed to be done about it, and 3. again, the hero point


It was intended to hit the White House (testimony backs this up) . There is no reason to add a contingency that is not useful and could backfire if not handled properly such as a plane crash.

testimony backs it up, huh? It was allegedly hijacked by a suicide squad so any possible testimony would be heresay.



posted on Jul, 18 2007 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by racerzeke
But what type of planes are we talking about? I'm assuming f-16s and stuff like that right? There hast to be more than a couple of those, and let alone a-10s which is what several witnesses say they saw around fl93.


i've never read that a witness saw an a-10...besides a-10 are primarily air-ground...it's prolly the only american plane built around a gun.....

but i've heard CT'ers claim that there were only 14 planes because of all the ones that were involved in the exercise...i believe Loose Change states this....however i dont feel like watching an hour and a half of stupidity, again.....


(the military always has exercises...back in july 06..we were involved in one where are plane was "hijacked"...and we were to be intercepted....however they didnt get a tanker...and couldnt reach us......there were several other planes playing along...thats the only air force wide one i've been involved in...but we do alot of basewide exercises)



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join