It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Security & Prosperity Partnership Myths and Facts

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 13 2007 @ 12:42 PM
Here is an interesting read for all those who are debating the facts and myths regarding the SPP.

posted on Jul, 13 2007 @ 01:54 PM
Yes, very interesting read... for the millionth time.

Myth snippets taken from

Myth: The SPP was an agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.

Fact: There cannot be a signed agreement as far as the SPP is concerned. All that may take place is dialogue, because soon as a written agreement is signed, Constitutional Treason will have taken place. President Bush has no Constitutional authority to be making the deals of which he has.

Section 10. No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.
Article 1 Section 10

Definition of state: n. 1) the federal or state government and any of its departments, agencies or components (such as a city, county or board). 2) any of the 50 states comprising the United States. 3) a nation's government. source

Myth: The SPP is a movement to merge the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union and establish a common currency.

Then please do explain why the creation of the "Amero" as it is just a conspiracy, right?

Myth: The SPP is being undertaken without the knowledge of the U.S. Congress.

Fact: Congress is slowly beginning to learn of the true meaning of the SPP, which is why there's legislation being drawn up on the State's level... against the SPP.

NAU resolutions currently in Congress and state legislatures:
*Modified for clarity*

• United States Congress:
- Congressional Switchboard – (202) 224-3121
- House Concurrent Resolution 40 – introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Virgil Goode of Virginia
• Arizona:
- Senate Switchboard - (602) 926-3559
- Senate Concurrent Memorial 1002 – introduced by Senator Johnson
• Georgia:
- Senate Switchboard: (404) 656-5015
- Senate Resolution 124 – introduced by Senators Schaefer, Rogers, Douglas, Hill, and Chapman
• Illinois:
- Office of Rep. Black: (217) 782-4811
- House Joint Resolution 29 – introduced by Representative Black
• Missouri:
- House Switchboard – (573) 751-3659
- Senate Concurrent Resolution 15 – sponsored by Senator Barnitz
- House Concurrent Resolution 33 – sponsored by Representative Guest
• Montana:
- House Switchboard – (406) 444-4800
- House Joint Resolution 25 – introduced by Representative Rice of Montana
• Oregon:
- Legislative Switchboard – (503) 986-1000
- Senate Joint Memorial 5 – sponsored by Senators George, Starr, and Whitsett and Representatives Boquist, Krieger, Nelson and Thatcher
• South Carolina:
- House Switchboard – (803) 734-2010
- House Concurrent Resolution 3185 – introduced by Representative Davenport
• South Dakota:
- Office of Senator Kloucek: 605-773-3821
- Senate Concurrent Resolution 7 – introduced by Senators Kloucek, Apa, Lintz, and Maher and Representatives Nelson, DeVries, Gassman, Jerke, Kirkeby, Noem, and Betty Olson
• Utah:
- Legislative Switchboards – (801) 538-1035 (Senate), (801) 538-1029 (House)
- House Joint Resolution 7 – introduced by Representative Sandstrom and Senator Fife (Passed in the House by a vote of 47-24 and was killed in the Senate for the remainder of the Congressional year)
• Virginia:
- Senate Switchboard – (804) 698-7410
- Senate Joint Resolution 442 – introduced by Senators Lucas and Hawkins
• Washington:
- Legislative Switchboard – (800) 562-6000
- Senate Joint Memorial 8004 – introduced by Senators Stevens, Swecker and Benton
- House Joint Memorial 4018 – introduced by Representatives Roach, Dunn, McCune and Hurst

Myth: The SPP infringes on the sovereignty of the United States.

Fact: Soon as that treasonous "agreement" is signed, the United States Constitution will be rendered null and void, thus killing America. With America being "dead", how do you suppose you will argue for your sovereignty?

Myth: The SPP is illegal and violates the Constitution.

Fact: The SPP is illegal and violates the Constitution. Refer to the SPP's very first myth. The SPP is a White House-driven initiative. - Quoting from the very next "Fact" printed on the SPP M vs. F sheet. President Bush has no Constituitonal authority. Refer to Article 1 Sec. 10.

Anywho..... I'll leave it at that. Thanks for the interesting read.


[edit on 7/13/2007 by Infoholic]

posted on Jul, 13 2007 @ 02:41 PM
Hell, I just can't leave well enough alone...

Myth: The U.S section of the SPP is headed by the Department of Commerce.

Being a "White House driven initiative"... the Federal Government attempted to get the U.S. taxpaying citizens to bring the standard of living in Mexico up to par with the U.S. and Canada as shown with the following resolution that died in Congress.

‘‘North American Investment Fund Act’’

To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American
Investment Fund between the Governments of Canada, of Mexico, and
of the United States to increase the economic competitiveness of North
America in a global economy.
S. 3622

Myth: The U.S. Government, working though the SPP, has a secret plan to build a "NAFTA Super Highway."

Fact: Building off of NAFTA, a Super Highway is in fact in the works. Quoting from the SPP M vs. F sheet... "There are private and state level interests planning highway projects which they themselves describe as "NAFTA Corridors," but these are not Federally-driven initiatives, and they are not a part of the SPP.

Oh really?

As such, we have developed a network of contacts with public and private sector individuals, organizations, companies and public entities, institutes and centers of knowledge, as well as with regulatory and governmental entities from the local, state, provincial and Federal governments of Mexico, the United States and Canada.

And who might that be?

You won't find the original text on the NASCO website, but you can clearly see what purpose was being served by reading a quote that I sent to my Senator.... here.

Myth: U.S. Government officials sponsored a secret SPP planning meeting in Banff, Alberta in September 2006.

Hell, that wasn't the only "secret" meeting that has taken place. There's been numerous meetings that the American populous was not made aware of. And they continue to this very day. When we do know about them, we're not invited, nor are we able to attend anyway, as shown here.

Myth: The SPP will cost U.S. taxpayers money.

I love this one. As I pointed out above... why would they attempt to sneak in S. 3622 or further the monetary aide by sneaking it into Bush's newest immigration reform bill?

Not so well known is the fact that supporters of the NAU concept slipped an initiative into the recently defeated immigration reform act. Largely unnoticed amidst the amnesty furor that ultimately sunk the Immigration Bill was the statement, "It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico."


I hope I've helped someone to understand what's being written, and undertaken right beneath our very nose. I guess that's enough for now.


[edit on 7/13/2007 by Infoholic]

new topics

log in