posted on Jul, 13 2007 @ 01:53 PM
I think it's a made-up being. It sounds like a kit-bashing of Vishnu and Krishna.
I did, however, search scholarly records, and there isn't any mention of Virishna, either. So... for something that's supposed to be 1200 years
older than Jesus, there's no temple records, no artifacts, no mention in any language, no appearance on any deity list, etc, etc.
I'm gonna brand that one a hoax.
(edited to add that apparently David Icke was the first to talk about "Virishna", if the sources I see are correct.)
[edit on 13-7-2007 by Byrd]