What good is it doing?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 9-7-2007 @ 04:45 PM by Munro_DreadGod
I am beginning to think that ATS members are single minded on this subject - yep GWB blew up the towers so that we could go in and get iraqi oil and kick off the whole afghan/middle-east thing. I even read that it was really to gain control of the drugs in afghanistan from the taliban who took it from the CIA.

I remember watching that day in complete shock, thinking this could not be hapening. All those people and the brave guys who went to help - dead.

Is the American nation still in shock - I say yes and that all the conspiracy talk is part of the process, but when do you say enough is enough? What good is all this talk having? OK here are the two possible outcomes:

1. This was an attack on the US by outside forces and all this talk about a 9/11 conspiracy is an insult to the memories of the folk who died and their families.

2. This was a setup by insiders who had a different agenda and used US and other nations citizens to meet their goals of world domination or whatever.

Lets face it lets your never going to really know but I say again what good is going over the thing again and again going to do? Is it more likely that there is a faction within ATS intent on poking a stick into the open wound to keep it from ever healing - yes.

All battles don't just take place on the battlefield, their is one happening on ATS for hearts and minds and feel free to call me ignorant but I am supporting the fallen and saying it was an attack by terrorists not the US government as I am sick of hearing.


reply posted on 9-7-2007 @ 07:46 PM by gottago
Wow.

I also watched that day in complete shock. I lived in NYC over 10 years and to this day I have not been able to bring myself to visit ground zero. The first time I returned afterwards, coming in from JFK with the flank of Manhattan spread before me on the CBE, with no WTC visible, is a moment I will never forget. I could barely look. I would always wait for that moment because it was a magnificent sight. Now it is a wound.

For years I bought the official story, even though I remembered the reports of bombs that day, and couldn't believe the towers could have fallen as they did. I just didn't want to believe, and I had my life to pursue.

But then one day I saw a zogby poll that recorded over a third of the public, and over half of NYers, believed 9/11 was wholly or in part an inside job. I was shocked and began the process that so many others went through, of intense immersion in the subject and the sickening realization that there was reason behind those poll figures.

I will not argue the elements of the events here, only state that to date, no one has been held responsible for 9/11. Not one person has even lost their job in the government because of the immense intelligence failures and military stand-down that allowed the events to unfold, even if you believe the official line. No one even had their pay docked.

Nonetheless, two wars have been launched, one of them having absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 though justified by it, and the "Patriot" Act was voted within two weeks of the event--a set of abridgments of our freedoms masquerading as anti-terrorism laws thicker than the Manhattan yellow pages just lying on the shelves, waiting--and the Constitution gutted with NSA wiretaps, torture, suspension of habeus corpus, secret CIA gulags, and on and on.

These things are not legal niceties. They are the foundations of a free society and what generations of true patriots have fought and died for since before the founding of this nation.

Even if you believe the official conspiracy theory put forth by the gov't about the events of 9/11--and that is all it is, none of it is proven--then at minimum you should be outraged that the crime has gone unpunished and that those in the gov't who failed to stop it were not punished either. To date, the only people in gov't who have suffered as a result of 9/11 are whistle-blowers who, out of a "pre-9/11 mindset" of patriotism and duty, have come forward to question the actions of the FBI and our intelligence agencies.

And if you don't believe that airplane impacts and jet fuel could have brought down the towers in an explosive collapse that occurred as fast as free-fall--that is, if you reject the manifestly impossible--then you are led to conclude that elements of the gov't condoned and aided the planning and execution of the attacks, and you would be supported not only by the evidence that simply cannot be suppressed--i.e., by the very simple fact of the impossible nature of those collapses--and by the dark history those attacks unleashed and was foreseen in the agenda (PNAC) of those now in power.

When you reach this conclusion, if you are a true patriot, you do not turn away and say, "What good is it doing, fighting for the truth?" You do not further enable the destruction of your country's liberties nor roll over and condone the country's governance by a cabal of ruthless criminals and traitors.

You don't just say, "enough is enough," shrug your shoulders, and turn on the TV. You do whatever you can to make others aware of what has happened, and prove the gravity of the situation by exposing the lies for what they are.

Apathy will destroy this country more surely than even the masterminds of 9/11.

[edit on 9-7-2007 by gottago]



reply posted on 10-7-2007 @ 03:30 AM by PistolPete
The problem with both believers of the official story and 9-11 truthers is that both sides have gone from trying to discover the truth to defending their version of it from the other side. This is counterproductive considering no matter where you stand, you're trying to discover the truth. (Unless you are a government agent trying to distract and deflect, or you're a 9-11 profiteer making a buck off hastily thrown together theories).

I'm the opposite of gottago. I bought every theory brought to the table. I was following whatreallyhappened.com within a few days of 9-11. I believed it all. Even the ones that contradicted other ones, I just manipulated them in my mind so that they would fit together. Like I see so many people doing now, still. It's like 'wow, that sounds like me four years ago'.

Then I started to look a little more critically at things. I watched sites I frequented accuse each other of being full of disinfo. I watched evidence I trusted and believed ('why would anyone lie about this' is what I thought) get thoroughly and convincingly debunked and slowly slip out of the 9-11 dialog only to be replaced immediately with something else that disappears within six months.

What sticks as the most highly debated topic about 9-11? Bombs in the building of course. Why? Because it can't be proven or disproved. Even though a lot of you on both sides are very convinced of yourselves. The point and counterpoints in all of the arguments are such that both sides don't really ever win or show anything new, they just strengthen their own resolves. This is while the rest of us that haven't been sold either way are just sitting there like WTF just happened?

It's sad really, because a lot of people, many more than are willing to accept that there were bombs in the building, believe that there was foreknowledge on 9-11. I think it's pretty clear that there was gross bureaucratic oversights and intelligence blunders during the years leading up to 9-11. This is tangible. People with records in public service have come forward with this kind of information. Unfortunately it's all too often sandwiched between loud debates about squibs and the melting point of steel. Stuff that most of us, including those debating a lot of times, don't really understand.

And this is the crux of the matter how I see it: Those that want a conspiracy will do everything in their power for it to be the truth. Those that don't want to see a conspiracy will do everything in their power for the official story to be true. When in reality, what probably happened was a little of the official story, and a little bit of a cover up. Everything doesn't have to be an absolute.

Debating the events of 9-11 is never a bad thing, it's actually a really healthy thing (if not taken overboard). In no way does trying to get to the bottom of what happened that day insult the memory of those that died. If I perished on 9-11 because of my treasonous government I'd want someone to find out about it.

What insults their memory is the discussing of this topic as an intellectual pissing contest.


reply posted on 10-7-2007 @ 10:58 AM by gottago
PistolPete,

Eloquent post and well-reasoned. I think your points are all valid, and I agree fully that there is a major effort to muddy the waters on both sides. I really trust very little of the evidence brought to the table by both sides.

However, the crux of the matter to me does not rely on the presence of bombs in the towers or not--though this question alone is indication of how throughly things have been confused and information squelched from the get-go.

My bedrock is the tower collapses themselves and the physical impossibility of them occurring as explained. This is the big lie, hiding in plain sight, and it requires an application of logic and some knowledge of construction, statics and basic physics to fully comprehend.

Unfortunately much of the public does not hold these skills and the cross-talk and disinfo surrounding 9/11 serves as excellent distraction, confusing many who are not able to immediately grasp its import. I must stress again, this is fundamental and the only solid, incontrovertible proof available to us, because you can't subvert physical reality.

If you understand what is happening in relation to basic physics when you watch any of those 11 second videos of collapse, you have only one conclusion to draw, and it is a horrific one. And unfortunately makes it much easier to navigate those muddied waters. But again, so many lack the skills and deductive thinking necessary to comprehend what they have witnessed.

There is also a strong component of willful or unconscious suspension of belief as well, as the reality is too horrific to contemplate. It is far easier to keep your head down and go on with things then stop and question and think.

Most of 9/11 will remain a dark enigma, but its import can be clearly divined from this one stubborn reality.


reply posted on 12-7-2007 @ 01:26 PM by Sky Eyes
Originally posted by Vinci

I've personally been attacked (not physically) for talking about these theories, but I still go on. I think in the end people will look back and say "Damn, they were right all along." Just like JFK! But alas, until then, people will hate us.


Vinci, Right on!! I've been studying 9-11 from various angles for over a year now and it is amazing the attitudes and vitrol that some seemingly educated people spew when something other than the "official" version is brought up.

I am currently studying anti-terrorism in college now (job-security) and have had the pleasure of sharing talks with some of our finest military men and women. In doing so I have noticed a distinct correlation between serving in the armed forces and refusal to entertain any thought that the truth may be different. Now, this is not an all inclusive statement by any means, but I have had the most negative reactions from the thickest necked soldiers.

A few weeks ago, the fact that in the 9-11 Commission Report not one mention of WTC 7 is made was brought up in class. This led to an immediate silence on the part of the "believers", as if to say that the question didn't exist.

I'm not one to believe in the "no planes" or holographic planes theories. I think this stuff is on the same level as some of Icke's theories, they just serve to make us (the thinkers) all look bad. But I cannot, and will not believe that 3 buildings just happened to fall into their own footprint after two suffered impact and one had small fires. Nor can I swallow the "fact" that Flight 93 just happened to hit the ground so hard that it was pulverized, but somehow pieces and personal effects managed to "bounce" to spots several miles away. As for the Pentagon, that neat, round hole first left by the impact was just a little too neat.

Yes, I know where you are coming from Vinci
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags