i wonder if these could be set up for the great civil unrest that follows an economic collapse of sorts, or shake down where there are many who lose
there life savings or jobs and are forced rather quickly into poverty.
if you think this is a joke, understand the BIS the bank of international settlements (which is a group that speaks about all the central banks in the
world) recently said
www.gata.org...
www.freemarketnews.com...
both very sobering, all the while the troops (which are broken down, tired, lack necessary equipment) have been ordered to sit in iraq and protect the
globalistic american beaurocrats and there oil gold mine intrests in the middle east
seems the corporations have left the american worker for dead and with manufacturing shipped overseas, the future of america is very chaotic and
uncertain, maybe a further seperation of the classes, and a building american "slave labor" as people do whatever it takes to put food on the table.
as the american consumer's bills become higher and higher and in turn buys less and less, forerign investment in U.S assets (net inflows) is
declining rapidlly. because of china doing what is best for itself and finding it time to cut the intresting trade win/win relationship the two have
had for a while. and as mortagage defaults rise higher and higher the banks will be tighter and tighter on there lending (credit) financing that the
american consumer has been largely financed from.
what can we expect
In a financial economy such as the U.S. where a disproportionate share of capital is invested in the capital markets, additional credit leads to
speculative bubbles. Greenspan/Bernanke & Co. have argued that the Fed has unlimited ability to create unlimited amounts of new money (helicopter
money) and intervene endlessly in the financial markets to support asset prices of stocks, bonds, or real estate. Therefore as long as this ability
isn’t curtailed through constitutional means or through gold and silver backing, the Fed can create sufficient quantities of money to bail out any
financial entity be it a bank, hedge fund, or government enterprise such as Fannie and Freddie.
hyperinflationary depression with bouts of deflation is what we will see
let me explain it in a way that lets you know why you should care about the monetera inflation we have been seeing from an expert
jen's o parrson's ("dying of money)
“Everyone loves an early inflation. The effects at the beginning of inflation are all good. There is steepened money expansion, rising
government spending, increased government budget deficits, booming stock markets, and spectacular general prosperity, all in the midst of temporarily
stable prices. Everyone benefits, and no one pays. That is the early part of the cycle. In the later inflation, on the other hand, the effects are all
bad. The government may steadily increase the money inflation in order to stave off the latter effects, but the latter effects patiently wait. In the
terminal inflation, there is faltering prosperity, tightness of money, falling stock markets, rising taxes, still larger government deficits, and
still roaring money expansion, now accompanied by soaring prices and ineffectiveness of al traditional remedies. Everyone pays and no one benefits.
That is the full cycle of every inflation
let me thrust this into the context of the political-economical-military reality america is in.
let me state something not reported in the newspapers or television
Never dismiss or discount or underestimate the impact on the USDollar currency from the US Military standing down in its buildup and threat toward
Iran
(especially if you "could be" ignorant of the fact that iran is no iraq) and iran has support from russia and china, should any attack occur coupled
with our forces being weakened. if we were to attack iran i think world war III would brake out .
alot of people (me included) often have the luxury of thinking about peaceful solutions to alot of things and thinking about some of the more abstract
discussion (alternative theories and the like) and we dont understand or want to believe that we were born into this luxury which (others dont have,
where there lives are focused on finding food or shelter or staying alive) may have been provided by the strong-arm tactics of the same u.s gov't and
military we like to ridicule for not being up front with the public about going into war. what i am starting to realize is that when the economy falls
we may get what we inadvertantly had been asking for
did the u.s govt lie about going into iraq and afghanistan yes
did they sacrifice the lives of 3000 nyc citizens to extend the comfy lives of the rest of our us citizens a few more years, and buy themselves enough
time to set up corporations and contracts globally and have enough fat cash to retire for good. probably IMO
could they have done it without the staged false flag ? with a more carefully planned attack in iraq and afghanistan with less civilian losses? to set
up there oil intrests and company in a society very umm not happy to have a foreign power take over. well maybe if the american people understand that
in today's day in age (wether we are aware or not) to have the luxury of being on top as an economy it is a very bloody game that most of us would
rather not know about , which may involve killing lots of people averse to a take over of the biggest exports of there economy) it was alot easier to
get support from american's initially by getting them angry, especially since they are greedy and decided iraq's bad decison to try to buy oil in
euro's not dollars should be punished and teach other nations a lesson in the process and i think they sacrificed 3000 lives so 200,000,000 million
could have 5 more years of comfort and the elite would have time to make more money and then get out. even though i think there could have been a
better action which would have made an example out of iraq to other country's threatening to do this, and keep the petro dollar strong, i think there
GREED MADE THEM GO THE EXTRA STEP
also these foreign country's also have to suffer from high inflation from holding these devalued dollars in the reserve banks also
sometimes life is cruel in the sense that both choices cause pain.
(wether you agree with my assesment of the war and attacks or not which were tragic but they are not the focal point of this discussion of the current
economic state
i don't think it would be a bad idea to make serious alternae plans to have the option of moving out of the united states and hold your money in gold
and the Euro very soon
mods sorry for this is a double post but i tried to edit an earlier post 8 hours ago and left this post up on the edit screen which i just finished
and thought it was important not to have it buried a page back when the discussion had moved forward.
[edit on 9-7-2007 by cpdaman]
[edit on 9-7-2007 by cpdaman]
