i wonder if these could be set up for the great civil unrest that follows an economic collapse of sorts, or shake down where there are many who lose
there life savings or jobs and are forced rather quickly into poverty.
if you think this is a joke, understand the BIS the bank of international settlements (which is a group that speaks about all the central banks in
the world) recently said
www.gata.org...
www.freemarketnews.com...
both very sobering, all the while the troops (which are broken down, tired, lack necessary equipment) have been ordered to sit in iraq and protect the
globalistic american beaurocrats and there oil gold mine intrests in the middle east
seems the corporations have left the american worker for dead and with manufacturing shipped overseas, the future of america is very chaotic and
uncertain, maybe a further seperation of the classes, and a building american "slave labor" as people do whatever it takes to put food on the table.
as the american consumer's bills become higher and higher and in turn buys less and less, forerign investment in U.S assets (net inflows) is
declining rapidlly. because of china doing what is best for itself and finding it time to cut the intresting trade win/win relationship the two have
had for a while. and as mortagage defaults rise higher and higher the banks will be tighter and tighter on there lending (credit) financing that the
american consumer has been largely financed from.
what can we expect
In a financial economy such as the U.S. where a disproportionate share of capital is invested in the capital markets, additional credit leads to
speculative bubbles. Greenspan/Bernanke & Co. have argued that the Fed has unlimited ability to create unlimited amounts of new money (helicopter
money) and intervene endlessly in the financial markets to support asset prices of stocks, bonds, or real estate. Therefore as long as this ability
isn’t curtailed through constitutional means or through gold and silver backing, the Fed can create sufficient quantities of money to bail out any
financial entity be it a bank, hedge fund, or government enterprise such as Fannie and Freddie.
hyperinflationary depression with bouts of deflation is what we will see
let me explain it in a way that lets you know why you should care about the monetera inflation we have been seeing from an expert
jen's o parrson's ("dying of money)
“Everyone loves an early inflation. The effects at the beginning of inflation are all good. There is steepened money expansion, rising
government spending, increased government budget deficits, booming stock markets, and spectacular general prosperity, all in the midst of temporarily
stable prices. Everyone benefits, and no one pays. That is the early part of the cycle. In the later inflation, on the other hand, the effects are all
bad. The government may steadily increase the money inflation in order to stave off the latter effects, but the latter effects patiently wait. In the
terminal inflation, there is faltering prosperity, tightness of money, falling stock markets, rising taxes, still larger government deficits, and
still roaring money expansion, now accompanied by soaring prices and ineffectiveness of al traditional remedies. Everyone pays and no one benefits.
That is the full cycle of every inflation
let me thrust this into the context of the political-economical-military reality america is in.
let me state something not reported in the newspapers or television
Never dismiss or discount or underestimate the impact on the USDollar currency from the US Military standing down in its buildup and threat toward
Iran
(especially if you "could be" ignorant of the fact that iran is no iraq) and iran has support from russia and china, should any attack occur
coupled with our forces being weakened. if we were to attack iran i think world war III would brake out .
alot of people (me included) often have the luxury of thinking about peaceful solutions to alot of things and thinking about some of the more abstract
discussion (alternative theories and the like) and we dont understand or want to believe that we were born into this luxury which (others dont have,
where there lives are focused on finding food or shelter or staying alive) may have been provided by the strong-arm tactics of the same u.s gov't
and military we like to ridicule for not being up front with the public about going into war. what i am starting to realize is that when the economy
falls we may get what we inadvertantly had been asking for
let me add to this, that (according to some smart people's logic) iraq had the conveinience and cover of a war fought to keep the us. economy afloat
(and that may seem supported by the previous paragraph) but this was an indirect benefit (a nice cover) for the alterior intention to extend the life
of U.S imperialism a bit longer so that the major corporations and polical leaders (not citizens) could take advantage of securing new contracts and
set up shop in the middle east, knowing full well that the united states middle class (uppermid and low mid) will have a very hard landing because of
the policy's carried forth by the fed (creating housing bubbles and leading the sheeple to DEBT) can't keep the economy on top forever. while the
fat cat investors made millions siphening of the management fee's and scams of this new leveraged "money/debt", it is diffiucult for any nation to
stay on top of the GRAND CHESSBOARD GAME for long
did the u.s govt lie about going into iraq and afghanistan yes
did they sacrifice the lives of 3000 nyc citizens to extend the comfy lives of the rest of our us citizens a few more years, and buy themselves enough
time to set up corporations and contracts globally and have enough fat cash to retire for good. probably IMO
did there decision to do this delay the inevitable slide of the us economy for 5 years (and in effect allow americans 5 more years to live the comfy
life) while it bought them more times to feast of there bubble's, set up oil contracts and get out with fat pocketbooks before america's economy
fell flat. probably
could they have done it without the staged false flag ? with a more carefully planned attack in iraq and afghanistan with less civilian losses? to
set up there oil intrests and company in a society very umm not happy to have a foreign power take over. well maybe if the american people understand
that in today's day in age (wether we are aware or not) to have the luxury of being on top as an economy it is a very bloody game that most of us
would rather not know about , which may involve killing lots of people averse to a take over of the biggest exports of there economy) it was alot
easier to get support from american's initially by getting them angry, and i think they sacrificed 3000 lives so 200,000,000 million could have 5
more years of comfort and the elite would have time to make more money and then get out.
also these foreign country's also have to suffer from high inflation from holding these devalued dollars in the reserve banks also
sometimes life is cruel in the sense that both choices cause pain.
(wether you agree with my assesment of the war and attacks or not which were tragic but they are not the focal point of this discussion of the
current economic state
i don't think it would be a bad idea to make serious alternae plans to have the option of moving out of the united states and hold your money in
gold and the Euro very soon
[edit on 9-7-2007 by cpdaman]
