It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by babloyi
I could very well claim that we are not equal, and I am greater than you, because I am me, and I am not you. And it would be true.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Why should we go out of the way to follow a set of rules, when (so long as we don't get caught, and it's easy enough to make sure of that), by 'cheating' the rules, we can greatly improve out lot?
Originally posted by babloyi
I disagree with the the blatantness of the statement "Everyone has a sense of morality". There is no proof of this, or at least, no logical conjecture or theory that supports it.
I also would disagree with the idea that all social animals have (in some limited way) a sense of morality.
An ant doesn't continue it's work to build the anthill because it considers it would be immoral... In some complex way (which we can't understand at this point in time), I'd says it's kind of 'hard coded' into it.
Most animals, as far as seemingly 'altruistic' behaviour goes, would only extend this courtesy to their family and pack...
Is this pack/family protection behaviour because of some sort of morality? I wouldn't think so. You have to help out in the pack, because if something goes wrong, you could be in danger...
(etc.)
It's interesting that research shows that contrary to what might be believed, for a social structure like humans have developed (excluding the family unit), those who 'cheat' (ie. have a greater tendency to behaviour that might be considered more 'selfish' than 'altruistic') would have a greater overall chance (from the natural selection point of view).
Why are people equal?
Where does this belief come from?
Judging from what I said, I'd not be too sure about needing morals to function in a structured society.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Why are people equal?
They are not.
Originally posted by babloyi
Benevolent Heretic, why are people equal? Where does this belief come from?
Originally posted by babloyi
I thought your original purpose was to show that all people are NOT equal. Something I strongly disagree with.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Are we all of equal intelligence? Of course not.
Are we all physically equal? No.
Are we all equal in the eyes of the law?
Are we all equally virtuous?
But is the essence of one person more valuable than another?
Originally posted by Astyanax
Would you agree with the statement 'most people have a moral sense'? If we agree to exclude not only 'psychotic or disturbed people' (whatever that means) but also infants and other imperfectly socialized people?
Originally posted by Astyanax
Yes, a moral sense presupposes self-consciousness, which is something we cannot with confidence ascribe to any non-human being.
Originally posted by Astyanax
This is an argument from sociobiology, which is somewhat out of fashion these days. Nowadays most evolutionary biologists would agree that selection takes place at the level of the gene, not the phenotype and still less the social grouping. If social behaviour evolves in the interest of genes, then altruism does so as well. There is no need to invoke group selection to further the argument. Explaining this in detail would take far more space than the ATS 8,000-character limit allows; see Dawkins, The Selfish Gene and a considerable body of peer-reviewed literature for the details.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Apples and oranges, BH, apples and oranges.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
That BH's dogs don't really love her?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I'm asking for your definition of the word "equal" when you claim that people aren't equal.
What's with the apples and oranges?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal...
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Bablyoi, did you even read the links I posted? Morality stems from emotion.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Are you saying higher animals have no emotion? That BH's dogs don't really love her?
"That special bond you think you have with your pet is imaginary. As long as it has food and water, you could get hit by a train tomorrow, and your pet wouldn't think anything of it."
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
I'm arguing for the fact higher animals have emotions and morality.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Some animals are self-aware, dolphins, chimpanzees and other great apes. Some are not self-aware the way we are, but still have rich emotional lives.
Originally posted by mojo4sale
Excellent post...
Earlier in the thread criminals and pyschopaths were eliminated from the discussion of morals. Why...
And how can we decide what is moral and what is not, surely it is subjective, what is morally right for some religions is abhorrent to others.
However... one thinks of the Jewish tradition, it is surely insulting to the people of Moses to imagine that they had come this far under the impression that murder, adultery, theft, and perjury were permissible.
-- Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great
(I) think (instinct and morals are) so closely intertwined now as to be barely indistinguishable.
Originally posted by babloyi
Hahahahhaha....self-consciousness is not something I can ascribe with confidence to ANY being except myself.
Research on the taming of foxes (that was started in the USSR) show that selective breeding with the most human friendly foxes could almost change them to be even physically more dog-like within the space of a relatively small number of generations?
About cheaters having a greater chance with natural selection, I read that up from Bill Bryson's "A Short History of Nearly Everything".
I'm deep into a game of the devil's advocate here.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
I think this is another instance of a creationist being unable or unwilling to accept that humans are just another species of animal. that are bound by the same exact biological laws as all other animals. We are not "other" or "above." We are animals. And what applies to us can be applied to others. Some animals are self-aware, dolphins, chimpanzees and other great apes. Some are not self-aware the way we are, but still have rich emotional lives. All of these types of animals -- including us -- have morality that stems from having emotions.
And who is to say that ants do not have emotions? Just because we wouldn't recognize what they may feel or experience does not negate the possibility that they also feel a type of "love" for their nest mates. I think that all living things feel on some level or another, even if we have no way of measuring or quantifying what or how much. Perhaps even plants
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
But to say that morality comes from god is primitive superstition.
Originally posted by Astyanax
How long do you think you'll be able to go on believing in the God hypothesis?
Originally posted by TheB1ueSoldier
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
I'm arguing for the fact higher animals have emotions and morality.
Animals have morality? Name some of the smartest animals you know. Dolphins, chimpanzees, canines.... all of which have been observed preying on their own offspring shortly after birth. All of which hunt their own species purely for sport.
Originally posted by babloyi
I am disappointed, MM. Here we were, having a nice little discussion, and then you charge in, guns ablaze, throwing about words like "creationist", "slugfest", etc., talking snootily about 'those silly creationists'. You accuse me of not visiting your links, but if you read through my response, you'll notice that I did. I just don't see why 'Dr. Waal' is correct just because he believes that morality stems from emotion, with just 1 example of a very suspect experiment with a chimp. I did not say that animals have no emotion.
Originally posted by TheB1ueSoldier
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
I'm arguing for the fact higher animals have emotions and morality.
Animals have morality? Name some of the smartest animals you know. Dolphins, chimpanzees, canines.... all of which have been observed preying on their own offspring shortly after birth. All of which hunt their own species purely for sport.
Morality comes from our biology. All social animals have a set of rules of conduct for behavior within their family or pack units. It's how these animals know what's "right" and "wrong" behavior with conspecifics higher and lower in the group hierarchy.