2012 Pole Shift survival guide, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times


reply posted on 28-6-2010 @ 09:46 AM by stereologist
reply to post by rapunzel222



Yes, he did write the forward to Hapgood's book. That was written before plate tectonics was

established and before the oceans were understood. This is an appeal to authority and Einstein was

not a geologist. He made a number of mistakes including the assumption that the Earth's crust is rigid. Einstein was not aware of isostacy. When Einstein conjectured that an ice build up could lead to an instability in the earth and a pole shift he made a series of mistakes:
1. isostacy - the earth depresses under accumulated weight
2. crust is not rigid - composed of a number of plates
3. plasticity of glacial ice - glaciers flow downhill

Although Einstein wrote a forward to a book outside of his realm of expertise it does not mean that the book is correct. Due to a lack of knowledge of the mechanics of the situation, the point of instability postulated by Einstein is never reached for the 3 reasons given above.


reply posted on 28-6-2010 @ 10:55 AM by stereologist
reply to post by Bocimaster



Apparently, you have done little research into this and that is correctable.

A pole shift is better known as a TPW, or true polar wander. This is not associated with a geomagnetic reversal.

Had you actually taken time to read the original post by L.O.organization you would see the following statements.
Every 26,000 years the poles shift, earth's crust is jostled so greatly that faults and fissures in the tectonic plates collide and are crammed together while elsewhere it's ripped apart and new land formations are created and some old, more so on the oceans coast are obliterated and not just by the land masses moving, but flooding or breaking off into the ocean.


One thing to know is that, when tectonic plates shift, the land is heated from the friction of one plate rising up against another as one is forced below into the earths many layers.


In a worst case scenario, when the pole shift happens and the tectonic plates shift


As can be seen from the original post, it deals with TPW and not geomagnetic issues.

I would recommend that you:
1. Read posts before commenting - quite obviously you did not
2. Learn the proper definitions of terms
3. Do not post ad hominem attacks



reply posted on 28-6-2010 @ 11:11 AM by Bocimaster
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to
post by Bocimaster



A pole shift is better known as a TPW, or true polar wander.
2. Learn the proper definitions of terms

No, a pole shift is a pole shift, if you say pole shift it won't mean TPW, just a pole shift.

As can be seen from the original post, it deals with TPW and not geomagnetic issues.

Yes i see that now. It was my mistake not reading it.


reply posted on 28-6-2010 @ 11:36 AM by stereologist
reply to post by Bocimaster



No, a pole shift is a pole shift, if you say pole shift it won't mean TPW, just a pole shift.

Quite wrong. A pole shift is the vernacular for TPW. As related in the following link. There are TPWs and apparent polar wanderings, and large scale shifts which can be either true or apparent.

Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis


reply posted on 21-3-2011 @ 08:56 PM by stereologist
reply to post by fromthatshow



The safe zone maps are as made up as any thing else concerning 2012. It's really funny to hear the sources of some of the maps. It's a friend in the government or a top level military friend, or scientist friend of a friend.


reply posted on 21-4-2011 @ 03:41 PM by stereologist
reply to post by kristy20



Pole shift happens mainly if any Tsunami or Earthquake happens.

Pole shifts are not related to tsunamis. They are a hypothetical construct described by Hancock that has not happened. Geologists have detected something called a TPW or true polar wander.

The link you provided mentions pole shifts in relationship to the magnetic poles. The magnetic poles are due to core events and are not affected by earthquakes which are surface events. The surface and core are separated by the immense mantle zone of the Earth.


reply posted on 10-4-2012 @ 11:17 AM by stereologist
reply to post by Crashyy



Do you mean geomagnetic reversal or a crustal event?

A pole shhift as described by Hancock cannot happen and has never happened.
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Cool Eclipse pictures (Earth, Moon, Sun, Pleiades)
  Posted 5 days ago with 24 member flags
Is Ron Paul evidence of human spiritual awakening in 2012?
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
May 20/21, 2012: the true meaning.
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Why the 2012 Phenomenon is Real!
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
World Message: Beginning May 26 thru Dec 21
  Posted 7 days ago with 14 member flags
newly discovered mayan calendars go beyond 2012
  Posted 16 days ago with 12 member flags
OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  Posted 1 days ago with 9 member flags
Secret rogue planet may be hiding behind Neptune
  Posted 11 days ago with 7 member flags