Not long ago, a well-meaning friend suggested that I create a cartoon character called “Captain Abundance” to help educate children on the
possibility of abundance. I have received many such suggestions over the years (including movies, books, speaking tours – I will probably never be
a public speaker, partly due to my own limitations). All I can say is good luck on those approaches, and maybe they will do some good, but I am
aiming for something different: a comprehensivist core of sentient understanding of how the world works, how energy, economics, politics and other
dynamics interplay, and if enough of a nugget of understanding can be developed, it can survive the disinformation, apathy, short-sightedness,
hacking-at-the-branches-mentality and other dynamics that derail such conversations almost before they begin.
To your observation that people are just too busy to read stuff like mine, I sympathize with that perspective, but that is only part of the dynamic.
Unfortunately, of the thousands of interactions that I have had with Americans, the most common response to my tale is a naïve one:
The below article is difficult reading, but still stands as one of the best summaries of the present American mentality that I have seen:
as is this one:
That is the America I have come to know, particularly since 9/11. The challenge is loving people who are in those dismal states. Just last month, a
survey was published that showed that more than 40% of Americans STILL BELIEVE that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11. Are their brains incapable
of functioning, or is something else happening? Again, very few Americans have proven to be open to messages like mine (as a group, the most
welcoming reactions to my work have been by women and non-Americans, and the most hostile has been from my “peers” – white, educated American
men). If thousands of people began singing the abundance song, and in tune, it might begin to make a difference. Maybe my approach is as unworkable
and futile as all the other approaches that I have seen, but I had to try. I have spent nearly ten years of my life making the attempt, without pay.
A number of people want me to let it go and get on with my life. If I did not see humanity hurtling toward the abyss these days, with George W. Bush
seemingly driving this train to oblivion, I might be able to, although once I tasted WHAT COULD BE, it has been hard to entirely let it go. I do not
want to become a hero/martyr like Dennis, Brian and Greer have. I am playing at a lower level, but one that I hope can help out.
If you want to continue this conversation, that is fine by me. If you want to try other avenues in your efforts, I wish you the best.
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I am not asking anybody to do anything else other than THINK about these issues.
It is here:
I did not say the person was “abducted,” and I cannot relate all of the particulars publicly, not unless that person chooses to go public with the
show that was received, which that person has not yet done. Not long ago, I talked with that person about the show again, many years after the first
conversation about it. That person never knew who gave the show, and I cannot reveal much about what was seen, but free energy and anti-gravity were
part of the show. That person would not volunteer everything about what was seen, and I cannot be more forthcoming on the time travel at this time.
Just let me say that there are plenty of people talking about it (Philadelphia Experiment, etc.). It can be done mystically, too.
My opinion is that the people giving the show were the “good guy” faction of the global cabal that Greer has interacted with:
The not-so-benevolent half is most likely who offered us a billion dollars to go away in 1988:
While I cannot go into the details publicly at this time, I will say that whoever put on the show said that those technologies would stay underground
until the time was right. They were trying to encourage my friend that they would be there to help if enough free energy awareness and effort had
manifested publicly, enough to make free energy “safe” to appear. I believe that they were probably afraid the dark half’s wrath if they tried
taking those technologies public in today’s world. I doubt that their reluctances was because of fears of what an unenlightened public would do
with free energy (but I also respect that argument), but what the dark half would do to keep the lid on free energy, anti-gravity, etc. I also doubt
that they were planning on releasing those technologies after Armageddon. That is something more in line with how the “dark half” thinks, and
religious fanatics who also refuse to imagine abundance:
Some of the people in my circles have played at the high levels, and they have entered a world that the movies only hint at. Just last year, I was
invited by one of them to Washington D.C., via a Bush administration invitation, for an alternative energy demonstration (an election-year ploy that
did not happen, for reasons unknown but I have my guesses, but am really not all that interested in what went down). It is a long story that I cannot
divulge the details of today, but let me say that George W. Bush definitely does not run the show. I declined the invitation, for several reasons.
Yes, the free energy device that my friend saw was probably very much like Sparky Sweet’s device:
The best ones are solid state, with no moving parts, and are pretty small. A home or neighborhood could easily go energy independent in short order
with that technology.
When Dennis had an audience with the most powerful electric executive in New England twenty years ago,
that executive called the electric company power line to a home an “umbilicus.” That is not too far from how the Big Boys see the energy
lifeline, I think.
(spilling over again)
[edit on 10-7-2007 by wadefrazier3]