This was just a question I had asked myself and didn't have an answer for

so I turn to the intelligently inclined. Everyone always cries about the

missing beams and random parts of the three WTC buildings to fall as crucial

evidence that should have been examined for signs of explosives used. They

would have been cut or severed specifically as if charges were used. My

question would be with all the remains of the dead we are still finding at

Ground Zero, is there a similar situation here that is being thoroughly

disregarded ? I don't know if these bones and human remains can tell a

tale of demolition, but what do you think ? Is there anything that could

possibly be known after studying the remains that we do not know as of

now ? Could the shape and condition of certain bones be proof of

something ? Anything ??

Well, about a thousand people are completely missing from the building, with no identifying parts. Most of the identifiable parts were pretty small, from what I understand, like bone fragments and things of that nature. That's definitely evidence of something but it won't stop people from telling you a pancake collapse did it all.

bsbray's spot-on; by what reason would we expect to find bone fragments on the scale of peas on the roofs of neighboring buildings years later?

The sheer improbability of this happening, if there was no explosive force to splinter and eject those human remains out of the towers and hundreds of yards distant, would lead us to reject the idea out of hand.

Yet this is just what happened when those fragments were found on the roof of the DB building years later.

You tin foil types should get out of mommy's basement more - as
someone been member of fire department for 20 yrs seen fragmented
and burned bodies. Doesn't take your mythical "controlled demolition",
micronukes or Death ray to reduce human body to few scraps of flesh
Seen it at plane crash when marked body parts for coroner and at MVA
with fire and had to remove charred remains. Many bodies at WTC were
recovered more or less intact. Those in protected locations on lower floors
were better protected. Fireman wearing heavy protective bunker gear
also. Those high in towers and near impact zone were reduced to dust
Considering the malestorm of steel beams and other debris falling
thousand feet anybody caught up in it was chopped into what could
described as "human hamburger". Also consider much of the debris pile
burned for months after - any body parts left were cremated. This
includes my neighbors two sons who worked for Cantor Fitzgerald -
nothing was recovered of them...........

thedman,

And you should learn some manners.

And don't go wrapping yourself in the burial shrouds of the victims to try to legitimize your bashing people on an an anonymous internet forum, it just shows how "deeply" you care about them.

And the machismo doesn't cut it either; this isn't pro wrestling. Brain cells and some relevant facts count a bit more here.

And finally, to point out the obvious, nothing in your bluster explains why bone shards should end up on rooftops hundreds of yards from the site of the WTC collapse.

So, welcome to ATS.

And BTW, spend a moment to read the posting T&C.