It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The U.S. Air Force and Navy are preparing different approaches to solving a gap in the nation's ability to deliver a conventional payload to strike any target on the globe within one hour of a go-ahead.
The Navy is looking to its Trident II D5 submarine-launched missile, while the Air Force is considering a land-based design using decommissioned Peacekeeper and Minuteman rocket motors on a Minotaur launch vehicle tipped with a conventional munition.
www.aviationnow.com.../awst_xml/2007/07 /02/AW_07_02_2007_p32-01.xml&headline=Navy%2C+Air+Force+Explore+Conventional+Strike+Options
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Why would we have to "call" anyone? Just make the missile emit a special signal encoded to mean "conventional". As for where it's headed that is really no one's business, let them watch their radar screens and act accordingly. We did not blow up the world when the Chinese shot an ICBM into space in secret, neither did the Russians, now they are complaining about our system? Please.
[edit on 5-7-2007 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
What the Chinese shot in to space wasnt an ICBM but an anti-sattelite missile.
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
About that signal. It could be forged...
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
...and if a minuteman III missile is on its way to Iran to destroy a super heavy fortress, it passes over the russian terretory then they will shoot it down with the excuse: Just for safety off our nation.....
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
Pssst: Where does the number 23 stands for?? I have saw it at Zaphod and you.
Originally posted by cyberdude78
If we do this, then that means that the Russians and the Chinese will be allowed to do this.
Originally posted by cyberdude78
And really, what's to stop Russia from launching a few dozen nuclear ICBMs and have them signaling that they're conventional for a preemptive strike?
Originally posted by Niall197
Is there any mission at all where the time factor is so critical that only a conventionally armed ICBM could be used ? In your inventory you've already got stealth aircraft and cruise missiles for the surprise attack ...
Originally posted by Niall197
At least you know at the moment that ICBM's=nuclear attack. That's a certainty.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
We did not blow up the world when the Chinese shot an ICBM into space in secret
What do you mean? The US and Russia can detect ballistic missile launches within seconds using DSP and SBIRS like satellites,
Originally posted by cyberdude78
The problem I see with having the missile emit a conventional signal is that such a thing could easily be abused. If we do this, then that means that the Russians and the Chinese will be allowed to do this. And really, what's to stop Russia from launching a few dozen nuclear ICBMs and have them signaling that they're conventional for a preemptive strike?
Not saying that they will be used like that, but that's how Russia and China are likely to see this.