posted on Jan, 10 2004 @ 11:11 AM
In that, who is President has little daily impact on the success or failure of entrepreneurs of both the small and medium varieties (of which I've
But that doesn't have anything to do with Bush's widely reported lack of intellectual curiosity.
They said the same of Reagen. People scoffed, but they were right.
They said Clinton was a sex hound. People scoffed, but they were right.
While I don't claim to have 'proof' Bush is not that bright a guy, I'm less inclined to defend his 'intellectual prowess' than some appear to
Why is it? Are Bush backers unwilling to accept ANY evidence or testimony damning him? That wouldn't speak highly of THEIR level of intellectual
curiosity would it?
Thanks for the article post S.O.
Just for fun...the man in question:
[Edited on 10-1-2004 by RANT]