posted on Jul, 3 2007 @ 10:26 PM
..i want to ask why does the work of mainstream science have a credible rep, when it seems (to me) that science doesn't abide by its own standard of
proof which it demands of the UFO community? EX: string theory: a very complex idea, understood today by as many people as understood the theories of
relativity (both of them) a hundred years ago, and that aint many people.. there are many theories that explore radical ideas about the existence and
behavior of subatomic particles.. one says that there are (were) possibly 23 dimensions that exist (or existed) in the relationships of protons,
neutrons, etc.. hard to follow, but, o.k.. its a theory, everybody has one and the right to talk about it.. what pulls my hair out is the adulation
and prestige these theories have attracted.. everybody from stephen hawking on down is yacking about various string theories: how they came to exist,
why they're not observable today, etc..
the problem is, THERE IS NO PROOF THAT STRINGS EXIST[ED] IN THE SUBATOMIC CONTEXT.. UFO skeptics holler, "where is the proof of your UFOs and
aliens?" i want to yell back, "where is the proof that subatomic strings exist?" forget about proof, neither is there any EVIDENCE that subatomic
strings ever existed.. this is all a bunch of ideas, words on paper.. there is not one itty-bitty piece of evidence that subatomic strings ever
iexisted, or exist today, but it's a great way to get your name in a physics journal.. subatomic strings are the rage and all the buzz iin physics
circles (squares, too)..
what hypocrisy, what disengenuousness, what bias! the world of ostensibly honest, integrity-bound, methodical scientists are bouncing all over the
place, all ga-ga about subatomic strings, for which there is no proof.. yet, when shown pictures of UFOs, burned patches of earth in well-defined,
peculiar shapes, some of which show the presence of above normal radioactivity, thousands of descriptions by all kinds of people (including law
enforcement and commercial and miliitary pilots, and recordied videos of radar tracks), "scientists" frequently have one explanation for it: swamp
it bothers me greatly that physicists and other scientists
are so interested in subatomic string theory (there are many respected theories for which there is no emperical evidence, i just picked this one) for
which there is no "footprint", no residue, no known effect which can be attributed to this theory, yet, the boxes of UFO reports, still photos,
videos, personal accounts by highly-trained professionals are so easily dismissed by supposedly open-minded practitioners of the scientific method..
UFO proponets are set aside as being merely gullible by those who engage in scientific work to investigate string theory for which there is no known
tangible artifact or record of credible observation..
and people ask me why i dont trust authority!
i do not necessarily believe in UFOs, aliens (as invasive bacteria or e.t.s), abductions, conspiracies or roswell.. i am not a UFO "nut"; i just
want to know the truth;
i believe we ere not being told the truth about these poorly-understood phenomena;
i believe the govt. has not been truthful with us about such observations;
i believe the govt. has little credibility in this area for many reasons; the easiest example is project bluebook; an admitted plan of deception,
discreditation and deceit;
i believe the govt. (every agency, from the white house down to the postal service) has contradicted itself in providing info about UFO events;
i believe the govt. is a poor liar, especially when it fights so hard to prevent info from being released about events which it denies ever happened.,
why are they so adamant about not discussing things that never happened?
i believe the govt. is using "national security" as a cover-up for hiding the truth about UFOs.. after 60 years, the lies, the excuses, the
shielding of the truth from everyone is really getting old..
(mod edit CAPS in title)
[edit on 6-7-2007 by pantha]