It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there. - Source
The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
Originally posted by BeZerk
Your claim in regards to the marble panels and windows was that it twisted from the impact is false.
Originally posted by wenfieldsecret
the towers were supposed to withstand a "low and slow" 707 lost in the fog looking for a place to land...such as the b-27 that hit the empire state building earlier.....
and there's reports of the building swaying 20-30 ft in both directions after the impact
I was on that floor when the second plane hit my building. The building swayed about two feet, then righted itself. (The building does—did—that normally, even in a windstorm, though obviously not as severely.)
Originally posted by thedman
Jet fuel blew down the elevator shafts and ignited - the jet fuel was in an
aeresol and formed a fuel-air explosion.
Originally posted by thedman
This was post collapse - burning debris rained down for blocks around
the towers.
Originally posted by ANOK
You do realise that jet fuel has a very high flash point for safety reasons? It's harder to get it to ignite than regular gasoline/petroleum. It's almost impossible to ignite unless it is atomized.
Originally posted by BeZerk
This is what you get for $3 Million:
Did NIST look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter.
NIST STATEMENT: "NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel."
Originally posted by defcon5
It will not ignite if you stick a match in it, it would extinguish the match, but if you put it in a hot piece of concrete and let the sun bake it for a awhile it can flash.
Originally posted by defcon5
Actually kerosene/Jet A has a very low flash point and can be ignited on a hot ramp by the sun.
A major problem with gasoline is that it has what is known as a low "flashpoint." This is the temperature at which it produces fumes that can be ignited by an open flame. Gasoline has a flashpoint of around 30 degrees Fahrenheit (-1 degree Celsius). This makes fires much more likely in the event of an accident. So engine designers sought to develop engines that used fuels with higher flashpoints.
Fuel for a piston-engine powered aircraft (usually a high-octane gasoline known as Avgas) has a low flash point to improve its ignition characteristics. Turbine engines can operate with a wide range of fuels, and jet-aircraft engines typically use fuels with higher flash points, which are less flammable and therefore safer to transport and handle. The first jet fuels were based on kerosene or a gasoline-kerosene mix, and most jet fuels are still kerosene-based.
Jet Fuel:
o Flash Point: >38 °C (100 °F)
o Autoignition Temperature: 210 °C (410 °F)
The flash point of a flammable liquid is the lowest temperature at which it can form an ignitable mixture in air. At this temperature the vapor may cease to burn when the source of ignition is removed. A slightly higher temperature, the fire point, is defined as the temperature at which the vapor continues to burn after being ignited. Neither of these parameters are related to the temperatures of the ignition source or of the burning liquid, which are much higher.
Originally posted by BeZerk
A white paper released on 2/3/1964 clearly states that the Twin Towers could have withstood impacts of planes traveling 600mph, a speed which was greater than the impact speed of either jetliner used on 9/11.
The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
[edit on 4-7-2007 by BeZerk]
So true. But, to take it one step further. At the end of their answer, they state that testing for thermate would be inconclusive because sulfur is in gypsum. Well, thermate also contains barrium nitrate which is NOT a construction material anywhere (as far as I know). So, why didn't NIST mention anything about the barrium nitrate? To hope that the average dumbness of the average American would shine through and they wouldn't know this. Just my opinion.