posted on Jul, 3 2007 @ 06:31 AM
As organelle had very well put in another thread, my interest in the "drone" case stems mainly from my interest in the study of human logic,
decision-making and in general in all those mind process aimed at discovering the "truth".
The particular example of the chad drone can very well be an hoax. In fact im 99% sure it is. But i lack any irrefutable proof of that, and that's
what id like to see or even provide myself!
By the way, even given an excedingly small probability that this is the real deal, when factored by the huge impact such a news would have on the
entire humanity, even a small 1% or heck even 0.1% probability of truth makes the whole thing pretty interesting
As i already said, to me too those images "feel" like cgi. And the whole story "looks like" an hoax, given the very low technical level of the
docs, and the completely implausible witnesses stories.
What i would STRIVE FOR is some very technical and detailed analisys of the photo. I would like that some expert come here with pixel-by-pixel
enlargements of the images and say -look his combination of pixel? is identical to this other one in this obviously cgi generated image!- And thereby
prove that some precise, unmistakable even for the non experts, quantitative aspect of the images lead to them being computer generated.
But making decisions over "similiarities" or "feelings" is just poor reasoning for me. And i like rigourous thinking in everything i do, even
debating about silly ufos