AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Weaponry discussion forum.  (rss)


Why are Black Hawks still used?


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 14-1-2004 @ 10:56 PM by OzChris


apparently the Australian government thinks the blackhawks are obsolete... according to the Air9000 documents I was just reading.

The documents explain the need to replace the hawks with Troop Lifting Helicopters.

Under the teaming agreement, the companies will offer the EH101 as the new additional troop-lift helicopter and for the eventual retirement of the Army Blackhawk fleet.

Sad sad day for blackhawk lovers in this country.

chris



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2004 @ 11:14 PM by intelgurl


Well it's not just the Blackhawks getting shot down - the Apaches are getting hit too.

Face it - you fire an SA-18 at a low flying Blackhawk and it's going down.
No time for flares or evasive action, just BOOM.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2004 @ 11:16 PM by intelgurl


Originally posted by OzChris
apparently the Australian government thinks the blackhawks are obsolete...
... for the eventual retirement of the Army Blackhawk fleet.
chris

Is that before or after they get those F-35's?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2004 @ 11:30 PM by intelgurl


FULCRUM,
by the way, the Penguin is your best avatar yet...
I love it!!!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 14-1-2004 @ 11:32 PM by groingrinder


Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
5 bladed? Like the H-53?

Thank God for Igor Sikorsky.

Of course, his brother elected to stay in Mother Russia, and Russia benefited for that.

Anyone can glide a fixed wing, but it takes a real man to pilot an helicopter. Right, Fulcrum?


I was under the impression that helicopters simply autorotated to the ground when power is lost.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 12:42 AM by Netchicken


I gather from "Blackhawk Down" that they are vulnerable in the tail area having their rear props blown off.

Surely they could put a cage like structure around the tail to deflect the fire?

Being vulnerable to grenade launchers at $100 each is an expensive way to lose some high tech machinery.

Maybe not being such "sitting ducks" as platfoms would help as well?

I read somewhee that they were making "tailless helicopters" now, I think.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 11:43 AM by SectorGaza


Originally posted by Netchicken
I gather from "Blackhawk Down" that they are vulnerable in the tail area having their rear props blown off.

Surely they could put a cage like structure around the tail to deflect the fire?

Being vulnerable to grenade launchers at $100 each is an expensive way to lose some high tech machinery.

Maybe not being such "sitting ducks" as platfoms would help as well?

I read somewhee that they were making "tailless helicopters" now, I think.




well, most of the kamov series helicopters dont have a tail rotor.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 03:43 PM by OzChris


man that second helicopter is the ugliest thing I have seen in a while..

What happens if the lose a rotor either top or bottom??

do they lose control?


Chris



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 05:58 PM by Carrion


Yeah, if one of the counter-rotating rotors got knocked out you would lose control. They use the two counter-rotating rotors to cancel the torque out that each rotor generates.

[Edited on 15-1-2004 by Carrion]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-1-2004 @ 12:33 AM by medic


UH-60 Blackhawks are not bad helicopters at all, actually. I'm here in Iraq right now, in 2nd ACR, on camp mullskinner, and in the aviation squadron, and we we've gottem up 24 hours a day. I'm sure you all remember a couple years ago when they were all going down in training. That was dues to the avionics getting screwed up by electromagetic fields given off by large powerlines. That has been fixed, since then. Most of the ones we lose here are from enemy fire. And when they lose power they do auto rotate but it's more or less a free fall to the ground so survival is low. A large problem is the transmission is prone to shooting forward through the cabin when its hit and thatkills alot of people too. For the record i'm not a pilot or mechanic, just a medic, but i don have a lot of friends who fly them or work on them.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 25-1-2004 @ 12:45 AM by cyberpilot


Thomas are you a Blackhawk jockey?...my brother flies a Kiowa Warrior...one of the bigwigs over at sikorsky is a customer of mine, he loves to Irk my brother with "I love my blackhawk" bumperstickers and the like....but actually the little,.. what was it a hughes or sikorsky?
thing they used in korea was the first to get nicknamed "chopper"...

signed,that argumentative fixed wing guy.

[Edited on 25-1-2004 by cyberpilot]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-1-2004 @ 06:42 PM by LoganCale


Not knowing any technical specifications on many helicopters, I must say that the Blackhawk is one of my favorite helicopters. Mostly on looks. There's something about the design that I just like a lot.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>






















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.043 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.