It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
During the last few decades, the great sensitivity of the Arecibo radio telescope has allowed radio astronomers to study the weak radio signals of objects such as quasars, galaxies, pulsars, and interstellar clouds. Radio signals from distant sources bring knowledge about the evolution of the universe.
Today, cosmologists believe that 13.7 billion years ago, there was nothing. No universe—no galaxies, no stars, no planets, no light, no space, and no time, nothing at all. Suddenly, for reasons that are still not understood, an astronomical explosion took place, and space and time began.
Now, how did the earth and universe begin? Well, if our greatest scientific minds can't figure it out with our ingenious physics models and theories we might need to look at it from a different perspective. I think by using logic we can disprove the universe beginning with a "Big Bang." The natural world can't explain a natural beginning, why can't we say that something outside our natural world created it? Supernatural maybe? God maybe? Whether you believe in God or not is of no consequence here. All I'm proposing is that a supernatural creation is just as logical as a natural creation. If you're like me and wondering how we came into existence I'd suggest turning to the first chapter of the book of Genesis. What's written there in the beginning of the bible could be considered just as reasonable to explain the beginnings of the earth or for that matter, the universe. Neither one offer any scientific proof whatsoever. Gen 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Why does this make any less sense than the big bang theory?
Originally posted by condorgirl
Your last external source insert kind of bugs me a bit. It's that old classic argument that 'If not "this", then it obviously must be "that"'. If not the Big Bang, then it MUST have been Genesis.
Originally posted by condorgirl
Anyway, getting back to this 'nothingness' point, what if, hypothetically of course, it wasn't so much a 'big bang', as it was a coalescing of energy that creates matter.
Originally posted by condorgirl
...the usual splittings of atoms and post 'big bangness' happened as per speculated. (It may mean that in several billion years, we may need to be 'given back' to the void from whence we came).
But that's just my hypothesis. Does that seem to be what you're looking for?
Originally posted by shearder
Suddenly, for reasons that are still not understood, an astronomical explosion took place, and space and time began.
Originally posted by condorgirl
So.. if I get this straight.. your REAL question is, what created the original 'something', or 'nothing', depending on your point of view.
Originally posted by condorgirl
Perhaps, the universe is really a recursive phenomena much like a like a mobius strip.
Originally posted by condorgirl
We are manifestions of a consciousnessness seeking to know itself, hence the 3 dimensional embodiment of matter. Once we finish knowing ourselves, our 'existence' is no longer necessary and we wink back to 'nothingness', until such a time (instantaneously perhaps), the consciousness decides it needs to 'reknow' itself. Kind of like the big bang, but with elements of the spirit aspect to it?
Originally posted by condorgirl
Maybe I should just go to bed..
Originally posted by swimmer
Originally posted by shearder
Suddenly, for reasons that are still not understood, an astronomical explosion took place, and space and time began.
Our "science" cannot really explain the weather patterns on Earth, or why apple falls from the tree. We know NOTHING.
Originally posted by thesun
inside what does a vacuum exist and how can there be nothing, when nothing itself has to exist inside something. the point is there was always something. wether you choose to call space or a blank.
If that were the case, would we re-exist again? Do we already exist a number of times in different universes? If time is a human idea, do we co-exist on/in different dimensions and in multiple universes. What if we are continuously winking out? If time doesn't exist, as we are taught it does, have i already winked out but is a different consciousness of myself remembering this - what i am doing now, what i did yesterday and does it know, already, what i will be doing tomorrow. Perhaps i have the wrong end of the stick but I guess it is consistent with the mobius strip theory - in a way.
Originally posted by shearder
So close your eyes and imagine space as we know it, remove planets from it, stars, etc etc, till you have an empty void with nothing in it. Now you have this huge empty vacuum, then imagine that doesn’t exist – what do we have? What would there be then, A HUGE empty vacuum. Easy to say “well hey, there is a he open space/vacuum. I mean, try and comprehend that “nothingness”. It is not easy to imagine what there would be if there was no Space/Multiverse/Universe etc.
So was there ever “Nothingness”. If so, where does oxygen or hydrogen or nitrogen or carbon come from if there was nothing?? I guess I haven’t found anything substantial enough via Google to substantiate or answer that question. Any solid answers out there? Has anyone else wondered about this?
Originally posted by Quasar
I have to reply to this because I've drivin myself pretty close to insane trying to wrap my head around things very similar to this. So with that said, here's my idea.
Our universe, as we know it, is about 14 billion years old. We only know that because around that time, stars started to light up. Everything beyond that is black. Now, looking 14 billion years into the past, is looking through time. What we see, at that distance, has had 14 billion years to evolve, this creates the timeline for the sequence of stars, etc. Supposedly, all the stars will eventually die to the point where they no longer have the Hydrogen to fuse, thus making the universe dark again. This is just one theory, of course.
This is just what we know exists in our part of the universe. What is to say, that 60 billion light years away, another "Big Bang" happened, and there are others in that "universe."
Now the key, is to figure out how to see and be able to travel to that other universe.
So let me get back on topic. Trying to figure out the nothing that all these universes materialized in is like trying to figure out what happens when your matter self decides to shake hands with your anti-matter self.
Originally posted by condorgirl
So.. if I get this straight.. your REAL question is, what created the original 'something', or 'nothing', depending on your point of view.
Well, if we think of this more 'absolutely', we can ask, 'who came up with the great idea of having a Universe'?
You know, it's 1am here in Vancouver, and I'm finding my brain getting stuck on that paradox (or Koan). Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Well, that one's easy now that we know about genetic manipulation and mutations.. but to take it further. And this may be a bit of a ramble..
In order for something to be manifested, there must be an 'idea' of this manifestation. This begs the question, who came up with the idea? That whole 'In the beginning was the 'Word'' business starts to look pretty good. However, then we ask, who created THAT guy with the idea?.
Okay. Carrying on, we know that words do manifest on a vibratory level (just go with that for now), perhaps.. hmmm
Perhaps, the universe is really a recursive phenomena much like a like a mobius strip. We are manifestions of a consciousnessness seeking to know itself, hence the 3 dimensional embodiment of matter. Once we finish knowing ourselves, our 'existence' is no longer necessary and we wink back to 'nothingness', until such a time (instantaneously perhaps), the consciousness decides it needs to 'reknow' itself. Kind of like the big bang, but with elements of the spirit aspect to it?
Maybe I should just go to bed..
Originally posted by CHRISTIANSEVEN
I AGREE WITH THIS EXPLAnATIOn THE MOST: God wants to know more about GOD lOl, but maybe the multi-verse is a constant ongoing puzzle of consciousness within our own heads !
Originally posted by Quasar
This is exactly why eventually I'm gonna major in something that has to do with this, right now I'm working on an AS in Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer, as soon as I have that, I'm striving for BS in Physics with a minor in math, or vice versa.
Beginning with philosopher Kant's supposition that humans cannot know a reality beyond their perception of reality, Alper uses his vast research into scientific phenomenon to build a case that humanity's perception of a spiritual realm is, in fact, the biological result of thousands of years of evolution. Alper writes that this is "'nature's white lie', a coping mechanism selected into our species to help alleviate debilitating anxiety caused by our unique awareness of death."